Literature DB >> 8402501

Combined determination of N-myc oncogene amplification and DNA ploidy in neuroblastoma. Complementary prognostic indicators.

T Muraji1, E Okamoto, J Fujimoto, S Suita, A Nakagawara.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: N-myc gene amplification is a well-established prognostic indicator in neuroblastoma. Flow cytometric analysis of nuclear DNA content has shown that an abnormal nuclear DNA content in neuroblastoma is associated with a better prognosis. Because some patients with N-myc unamplified tumors have a poor prognosis, factors other than N-myc amplification may play a role in determining the clinical behavior of neuroblastoma. In the current study, the authors correlated N-myc gene amplification and flow cytometric nuclear DNA content with respect to prognosis.
METHODS: Forty-one patients with neuroblastoma, including 15 screened patients, served as subjects. The copy number of the N-myc gene was determined by Southern blot analysis. DNA ploidy analysis was done on nuclei isolated from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks.
RESULTS: Of 40 specimens of neuroblastoma, 7 involved tumors containing amplification of the N-myc gene and 33 did not; 13 specimens showed DNA diploidy, and 27 showed DNA aneuploidy (including 4 with DNA tetraploidy). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated a significantly better prognosis in patients with unamplified N-myc tumors compared with those with N-myc amplified tumors (87.3% versus 28.6%, P < 0.05) and in patients with DNA aneuploid tumors compared with those with DNA diploid tumors (96.3% versus 43.0%, P < 0.001). The difference in the survival of the two extreme combinations, (e.g., 25 with N-myc unamplified and DNA aneuploidy [4 tetraploidy] versus 5 with N-myc amplified and DNA diploidy) was more significant (96.0% versus 20.0%, P < 0.001) than any other combination.
CONCLUSION: Evaluations of N-myc gene amplification and DNA ploidy are complementary, and the combined determination of these two factors may be one of the most powerful prognostic indicators in neuroblastoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8402501     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19931101)72:9<2763::aid-cncr2820720938>3.0.co;2-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  4 in total

Review 1.  Neuroblastoma tumour genetics: clinical and biological aspects.

Authors:  N Bown
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Thoracic neuroblastoma: outcome of incomplete resection.

Authors:  Atsushi Horiuchi; Toshihiro Muraji; Chikara Tsugawa; Eiji Nishijima; Shiiki Satho; Shigeru Takamizawa; Hideo Misu; Osamu Mabuchi; Kimio Kanagawa; Masayuki Fujita
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2004-07-24       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 3.  Neuroblastoma stage IV-S.

Authors:  T D Miale; K Kirpekar
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  The genetic tumor background is an important determinant for heterogeneous MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Dominik Bogen; Clemens Brunner; Diana Walder; Andrea Ziegler; Reza Abbasi; Ruth L Ladenstein; Rosa Noguera; Tommy Martinsson; Gabriele Amann; Freimut H Schilling; Marek Ussowicz; Martin Benesch; Peter F Ambros; Inge M Ambros
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 7.396

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.