Literature DB >> 8402444

Long-term results of transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma. A multivariate analysis of prognostic factors.

P Gertsch1, J N Vauthey, A A Lustenberger, H Friedlander-Klar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Perioperative mortality and survival after esophagectomy have improved over the past 10 years. Although stage is the most powerful predictor of long-term survival, it remains unclear whether other factors influence prognosis.
METHODS: Between 1981-1991, 100 patients with esophageal carcinoma were uniformly treated by transhiatal esophagectomy without adjuvant therapy. Results and prognostic factors of long-term survival were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses (log-rank test and Cox regression model).
RESULTS: Forty-eight patients had severe associated medical conditions, and 26 patients were older than 69 years of age. Mortality was 3%, and morbidity was 68%. With a median follow-up of 52 months, median survival was 18 months. The overall 5-year survival was 23%, but it was 63% for early stages (pT1 + pT2). In the multivariate analysis, the risk of dying was increased by 4.9 (risk ratio) for patients with carcinomas invading beyond the muscularis propria (pT3 + pT4), compared to lower stages (pT1 + pT2) (P < 0.0001). To a lesser extent, longterm survival was also adversely affected by transfusions (packed erythrocytes) after controlling for stage (risk ratio 1.7; P = 0.047). Age (> 69 years), preoperative weight loss, tumor location, histology (adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma), fresh frozen plasma, and splenectomy did not influence survival.
CONCLUSION: In this study, transhiatal esophagectomy provided palliation for esophageal cancer with a low-perioperative mortality. Prolonged survival or cure was obtained for the majority of patients operated on in the early stages. Blood transfusions had a slight adverse effect on long-term survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8402444     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19931015)72:8<2312::aid-cncr2820720805>3.0.co;2-m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  6 in total

1.  Should en bloc esophagectomy be the standard of care for esophageal carcinoma?

Authors:  N Altorki; D Skinner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements.

Authors:  M B Orringer; B Marshall; M D Iannettoni
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Transhiatal esophagectomy for treatment of benign and malignant esophageal disease.

Authors:  M B Orringer; B Marshall; M D Iannettoni
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Transhiatal versus transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  J Camilo Barreto; Mitchell C Posner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Three-field transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy in the management of carcinoma esophagus-a single--center experience with a review of literature.

Authors:  Sivaram Ganesamoni; Arvind Krishnamurthy
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2014-03

6.  A hospital's annual rate of esophagectomy influences the operative mortality rate.

Authors:  M G Patti; C U Corvera; R E Glasgow; L W Way
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.267

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.