Literature DB >> 8402115

Anterior versus posterior reconstruction after transhiatal oesophagectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

H Bartels1, S Thorban, J R Siewert.   

Abstract

In a prospective randomized trial the clinical results after transhiatal oesophagectomy with reconstruction in the anterior mediastinum (51 patients) or posterior mediastinum (45 patients) were compared. There were no differences in age, preoperative risk factors, tumour stage and local (surgical) complications between the two groups. However, reconstruction in the posterior mediastinum was associated with significantly fewer days spent in the intensive therapy unit (9 versus 14), fewer cardiopulmonary complications (13 versus 25 per cent) and lower mortality (30-day mortality rate 2 versus 6 per cent; hospital mortality rate 4 versus 10 per cent). These data show superiority of reconstruction in the posterior mediastinum after transhiatal oesophagectomy. This route is strongly recommended, particularly for patients with cardiopulmonary risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8402115     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800800924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  14 in total

1.  Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer.

Authors:  W H Allum; S M Griffin; A Watson; D Colin-Jones
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Intratracheal long-term pH monitoring: a new method to evaluate episodes of silent acid aspiration in patients after esophagectomy and gastric pull up.

Authors:  Werner K H Kauer; Hubert J Stein; Holger Bartels; J Rüdiger Siewert
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Impact of the route of reconstruction on post-operative morbidity and malnutrition after esophagectomy: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Makoto Yamasaki; Hiroshi Miyata; Takushi Yasuda; Osamu Shiraishi; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Masaaki Motoori; Masahiko Yano; Hitoshi Shiozaki; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: short- and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  S Leibman; B M Smithers; D C Gotley; I Martin; J Thomas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Duodenogastric reflux after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up: the effect of the route of reconstruction.

Authors:  Iraklis E Katsoulis; Ioannis Robotis; Grigorios Kouraklis; Panagiotis Yannopoulos
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature.

Authors:  Robert C G Martin; Murray F Brennan; David P Jaques
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Gastric tube perforation after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Hideyuki Ubukata; Takeshi Nakachi; Takanobu Tabuchi; Hiroyuki Nagata; Akira Takemura; Jiro Shimazaki; Satoru Konishi; Takafumi Tabuchi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Esophagectomy without mortality: what can surgeons do?

Authors:  Simon Law
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Prognostic indicators of surgery for esophageal cancer: a 5 year experience.

Authors:  Nadim Khan; Adil Bangash; Muzaffaruddin Sadiq
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.485

10.  Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophageal resection and gastric tube reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial comparing sutured neck anastomosis with stapled intrathoracic anastomosis.

Authors:  Bruno Walther; Jan Johansson; Folke Johnsson; Christer Staël Von Holstein; Thomas Zilling
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.