Literature DB >> 8402021

Inter-observer variation in assessment of the prostate by digital rectal examination.

E Varenhorst1, K Berglund, O Löfman, K Pedersen.   

Abstract

In a prospective study, inter-observer variation in the assessment of the prostate by digital rectal examination (DRE) by a urologist and a general practitioner was analysed. The 2 physicians performed independent assessment of the prostate in 933 men aged 50 to 69 years with regard to 9 variables as part of a screening programme for carcinoma of the prostate. Complete agreement for all observations was reached in 46.5% of the men. Using kappa (K) statistics, the values were adjusted for the expected chance agreement. K values between 0.485 and 0.682 were obtained for 6 variables representing good agreement; these were size, tenderness, midline furrow, symmetry, induration and nodularity. Agreement regarding fixation, lateral sulci and seminal vesicles was poor owing to the small number of cases deviating from normal. Contrary to the general belief that DRE is highly subjective, our results show a good correspondence between the observations of the examiners when assessing the prostate in a systematic way.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8402021     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1993.tb00682.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Urol        ISSN: 0007-1331


  8 in total

1.  New arrangements for NHS R&D funding: implications for primary care research.

Authors:  Roger Jones; Yvonne Carter; Sean Hilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Cancer recognition and primary care.

Authors:  Nicholas Summerton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  The Utility of Digital Rectal Examination in Estimating Prostate Volume in a Rural Hospital Setting.

Authors:  E I Udeh; N K Dakum; S A Aderibigbe; J A Edeh
Journal:  Niger J Surg       Date:  2015 Jul-Dec

4.  An audit of prostate-specific antigen and clinical symptoms in general practice.

Authors:  S Ramachandran; M C Foster; D R Thomas; A K Roalfe; R A Hall
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  C Hamashima; K Yoshida
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.674

6.  Randomised prostate cancer screening trial: 20 year follow-up.

Authors:  Gabriel Sandblom; Eberhard Varenhorst; Johan Rosell; Owe Löfman; Per Carlsson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-03-31

7.  Dichotomous estimation of prostate volume: a diagnostic study of the accuracy of the digital rectal examination.

Authors:  Michael Z Su; Daniel Lenaghan; Henry H Woo
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 5.400

8.  Profiling of Circulating microRNAs in Prostate Cancer Reveals Diagnostic Biomarker Potential.

Authors:  Jacob Fredsøe; Anne K I Rasmussen; Peter Mouritzen; Marianne T Bjerre; Peter Østergren; Mikkel Fode; Michael Borre; Karina D Sørensen
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.