Literature DB >> 840192

Calibration in water versus calibration in air for cobalt-60 gamma rays.

W H Grant, J H Cundiff, W F Gagnon, W F Hanson, R J Shalek.   

Abstract

In the United States it is common practice to calibrate Cobalt-60 teletherapy machines "in air," despite recommendations by the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) and other organizations that calibration be accomplished by measurement at 5-cm depth in a water phantom. A comparison has been made between the results of ionization measurements in air at 80.5-cm distance from the source and in water at 80-cm source-skin distance (SSD) for the determination of absorbed dose at three depth (5, 10, and 15 cm) for each of three fields sizes (6 X 6, 10 X 10, and 20 X 20 cm2), for a total of 42 Cobalt-60 machines. The mean of the ratio, absorbed dose from in-water measurements to absorbed dose at the same depth calculated from in-air measurements, ranged frt 5-cm depth for a 20 X 20-cm2 field size. Reasons for the differences are offered, and compliance with ICRU recommendations is suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 840192     DOI: 10.1118/1.594294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  1 in total

1.  Comment on the "Zero-shift thimble ionization chamber" [Med. Phys. 37, 1161-1163 (2010)].

Authors:  Peter R Almond
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.071

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.