Literature DB >> 8401058

Taking babies' temperatures: science versus social taboos in battle over Baby Check.

S Handysides1.   

Abstract

Baby Check, a scoring system for assessing the severity of illness in babies under 6 months old, has not met with the success its developers expected. The inclusion of rectal temperature in the assessment was strongly opposed by the Royal College of Midwives, which refused to alter its view despite evidence of the safety and accuracy of rectal thermometry. British parents appear not to like rectal thermometers either. Most other medical bodies have supported Baby Check and the reason for midwives' opposition may have more to do with professional pique at not being consulted than clinical wisdom.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8401058      PMCID: PMC1678998          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.307.6905.673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  5 in total

1.  Taking infants' temperatures.

Authors:  D Keeley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-04-11

2.  Baby Check: a scoring system to grade the severity of acute systemic illness in babies under 6 months old.

Authors:  C J Morley; A J Thornton; T J Cole; P H Hewson; M A Fowler
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Field trials of the Baby Check score card: mothers scoring their babies at home.

Authors:  A J Thornton; C J Morley; S J Green; T J Cole; K A Walker; J M Bonnett
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Parents' perceptions of taking babies' rectal temperature.

Authors:  J Kai
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-09-11

5.  Axillary and rectal temperature measurements in infants.

Authors:  C J Morley; P H Hewson; A J Thornton; T J Cole
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.791

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Babies' rectal temperature. Is a rectal temperature always necessary.

Authors:  S M Gore
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-10-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.