Literature DB >> 8400024

The influence of the time period between preconditioning ischemia and prolonged ischemia on myocardial protection.

A M Alkhulaifi1, W B Pugsley, D M Yellon.   

Abstract

Ischemic preconditioning with brief periods of ischemia followed by reperfusion protects the myocardium against a subsequent prolonged ischemic insult. Reperfusion may influence the protection given by ischemic preconditioning by washing out metabolites that are accumulated during the preconditioning ischemia. This study was designed to define the duration of reperfusion necessary to provide such protection. Hearts of anesthetized rats were preconditioned by occlusion of the left coronary artery for 5 minutes. This was followed by reperfusion for either 1 minute (n = 6) or 30 seconds (n = 6). The hearts were then subjected to a sustained occlusion of the left coronary artery for 45 minutes followed by reperfusion for 3 hours. Control (n = 11) hearts were subjected only to occlusion of the left coronary artery for 45 minutes followed by reperfusion for 3 hours. Infarct size was measured using tetrazolium and expressed as a percentage of the region at risk. After reperfusion for 1 minute there was a significant reduction in the size of the infarct (32.3 +/- 4.1%), expressed as a percentage of the zone at risk, when compared to controls (61.9 +/- 3.5%) (p < 0.01). However, the protection received by preconditioning was lost when reperfusion was limited to 30 seconds (infarct size 63.4 +/- 3.2%). The results show that the minimum period of reperfusion required to give protection after preconditioning ischemia lies between 30 seconds and 1 minute.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8400024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardioscience        ISSN: 1015-5007


  9 in total

Review 1.  Neuroprotective effects of ischemic preconditioning in brain mitochondria following cerebral ischemia.

Authors:  Miguel A Pérez-Pinzón
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.945

Review 2.  Mechanisms of neuroprotection during ischemic preconditioning: lessons from anoxic tolerance.

Authors:  Miguel A Perez-Pinzon
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 2.320

3.  Ischaemic preconditioning.

Authors:  M Marber; D Walker; D Yellon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-01-01

4.  Is warm-up in angina ischaemic preconditioning?

Authors:  M S Marber; M D Joy; D M Yellon
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-09

Review 5.  Preconditioning for traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Shoji Yokobori; Anna T Mazzeo; Khadil Hosein; Shyam Gajavelli; W Dalton Dietrich; M Ross Bullock
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 6.829

Review 6.  Extracellular signalling molecules in the ischaemic/reperfused heart - druggable and translatable for cardioprotection?

Authors:  P Kleinbongard; G Heusch
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 7.  Balloon Occlusion Types in the Treatment of Coronary Perforation during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Xiangfei Wang; Junbo Ge
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 1.866

8.  The Timing of Raf/ERK and AKT Activation in Protecting PC12 Cells against Oxidative Stress.

Authors:  Qunxiang Ong; Shunling Guo; Liting Duan; Kai Zhang; Eleanor Ann Collier; Bianxiao Cui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effluent from ischemic preconditioned hearts confers cardioprotection independent of the number of preconditioning cycles.

Authors:  Katharina Feige; Annika Raupach; Carolin Torregroza; Jan Muehlenbernd; Martin Stroethoff; Sebastian Bunte; Markus W Hollmann; Ragnar Huhn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.