Literature DB >> 8399701

Satisfaction of attenders during the establishment of an Australian mammography screening program.

J Cockburn1, D Hill, T De Luise, D Flint-Richter.   

Abstract

We aimed to examine the satisfaction and the predictors of reported satisfaction with the service offered by a pilot mammography screening service. Information was collected from 481 attenders at the screening clinic and from 318 consecutive attenders at the recall clinic using two different standard self-administered questionnaires covering respectively six and five dimensions of satisfaction. For the screening clinic attenders, mean scores on most subscales indicated quite high levels of satisfaction. There were no significant differences among different samples over time for the perceptions of technical competence of the staff. Decreases in reported level of satisfaction were found for subscales measuring interpersonal skills, information giving, physical surroundings, convenience and accessibility, and general satisfaction. Waiting times, age and marital status were predictors in most satisfaction subscales. For those attending the recall clinic, mean satisfaction scores for most scales were high, except for the scale measuring satisfaction with the way the results were received. The median time between screening and recall visits for women in this study was 27 days (range 3 to 112 days). Attenders were most dissatisfied with the delay in getting results, an area where the service might improve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8399701     DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1993.tb00116.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust J Public Health        ISSN: 1035-7319


  5 in total

1.  The effect of access and satisfaction on regular mammogram and Papanicolaou test screening in a multiethnic population.

Authors:  Carol P Somkin; Stephen J McPhee; Tung Nguyen; Susan Stewart; Sarah J Shema; Bang Nguyen; Rena Pasick
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Measuring satisfaction with mammography results reporting.

Authors:  N C Dolan; J Feinglass; A Priyanath; C Haviley; A V Sorensen; L A Venta
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Mammography: influence of departmental practice and women's characteristics on patient satisfaction: comparison of six departments in Norway.

Authors:  K Løken; S Steine; E Laerum
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-09

4.  An assessment of American Indian women's mammography experiences.

Authors:  Kimberly K Engelman; Christine M Daley; Byron J Gajewski; Florence Ndikum-Moffor; Babalola Faseru; Stacy Braiuca; Stephanie Joseph; Edward F Ellerbeck; K Allen Greiner
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Improving screening recall services for women with false-positive mammograms: a comparison of qualitative evidence with UK guidelines.

Authors:  Mary Bond; Ruth Garside; Christopher Hyde
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.