Literature DB >> 8399235

Cytochrome c peroxidase binds two molecules of cytochrome c: evidence for a low-affinity, electron-transfer-active site on cytochrome c peroxidase.

E D Stemp1, B M Hoffman.   

Abstract

We have studied the affinity and stoichiometry of binding of cytochrome c (Cc) to zinc-substituted cytochrome c peroxidase [(ZnP)CcP], which is structurally and electrostatically equivalent to ferrous CcP. Transient absorption spectroscopy has been used to measure both the total quenching of the triplet-state (ZnP)CcP [3(ZnP)CcP] by Fe3+Cc and the fraction of that quenching that is due to electron transfer (et). This redox quenching results in the formation of an intermediate (I) containing the zinc porphyrin pi-cation radical [(ZnP)+CcP] and Fe2+Cc. In titrations of (ZnP)CcP with Fe3+Cc(F) at low ionic strength, where F represents the fungal cytochromes c from Candida krusei, Pichia membranefaciens, or the yeast protein iso-1, the appearance of the et intermediate lags behind the total quenching, with appreciable formation of I occurring only for Cc to CcP ratios > 1. This behavior results from the formation of a 2:1 complex, where one Fe3+Cc(F) binds to a high-affinity domain that exhibits strong quenching yet is et-inactive, while the second Fe3+Cc(F) binds to a low-affinity domain that allows efficient et quenching. At constant concentrations of both proteins, raising the ionic strength eliminates most of the et quenching but reduces the total quenching only minimally, confirming that et occurs preferentially at the low-affinity binding domain, which is the more sensitive to ionic strength. Analogous experiments also favor a 2:1 binding stoichiometry for horse Cc [Cc(horse)] at low ionic strength, with et quenching again proceeding much more favorably in the 2:1 complex than in the 1:1 complex, as with Cc(F). However, the Fe3+Cc(horse) quenches only by electron transfer, unlike the Cc(F). The decay of the triplet-state (ZnP)CcP or magnesium-substituted CcP [(MgP)CcP] was examined during titrations with Fe3+Cc to determine limits for the dissociation rate constant (koff) for the complex. Fe3+Cc(horse) bound to the high-affinity domain in a 1:1 complex at low ionic strength is in rapid exchange, with koff > 50 S-1, whereas Fe3+Cc(F) has koff < 200 s-1. Both types of Fe3+Cc have koff > 10(4)S-1 when they are bound to the low-affinity domain in a 2:1 complex, at both low and high ionic strengths. In contrast, when in the ferrous form, both types of Cc have much lower values of koff (< 10 S-1) at low ionic strength when bound to the low-affinity domain.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8399235     DOI: 10.1021/bi00091a041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  22 in total

1.  Excision of a proposed electron transfer pathway in cytochrome c peroxidase and its replacement by a ligand-binding channel.

Authors:  Robin J Rosenfeld; Anna-Maria A Hays; Rabi A Musah; David B Goodin
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Long-range electron transfer.

Authors:  Harry B Gray; Jay R Winkler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Effects of interface mutations on association modes and electron-transfer rates between proteins.

Authors:  Seong A Kang; Brian R Crane
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Characterization of four covalently-linked yeast cytochrome c/cytochrome c peroxidase complexes: Evidence for electrostatic interaction between bound cytochrome c molecules.

Authors:  Siddhartha Nakani; Lidia B Vitello; James E Erman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Solution NMR study of the yeast cytochrome c peroxidase: cytochrome c interaction.

Authors:  Alexander N Volkov; Nico A J van Nuland
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 6.  Pathways, pathway tubes, pathway docking, and propagators in electron transfer proteins.

Authors:  W B Curry; M D Grabe; I V Kurnikov; S S Skourtis; D N Beratan; J J Regan; A J Aquino; P Beroza; J N Onuchic
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.945

7.  Constraints on the Radical Cation Center of Cytochrome c Peroxidase for Electron Transfer from Cytochrome c.

Authors:  Thomas M Payne; Estella F Yee; Boris Dzikovski; Brian R Crane
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 8.  Heme enzyme structure and function.

Authors:  Thomas L Poulos
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 60.622

9.  Crystal structure and characterization of a cytochrome c peroxidase-cytochrome c site-specific cross-link.

Authors:  Maolin Guo; B Bhaskar; Huiying Li; Tiffany P Barrows; Thomas L Poulos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Electron transfer between cytochrome c and cytochrome c peroxidase.

Authors:  F Millett; M A Miller; L Geren; B Durham
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.945

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.