Literature DB >> 8395577

Intrinsic properties and evoked responses of guinea pig subicular neurons in vitro.

M Stewart1, R K Wong.   

Abstract

1. Intracellular recordings were used to examine the membrane properties and evoked responses of subicular neurons in horizontal and parasagittal slices from guinea pig brain as a step toward understanding excitatory transmission through the hippocampus. 2. Most cells (49/74) could fire a burst discharge, a portion of which was Ca2+ dependent, in response to direct depolarization or in response to orthodromic or antidromic activation. Other cells (23/74) could not be made to burst, but instead fired single repetitive spikes when directly depolarized or single spikes in response to orthodromic or antidromic activation. Two recorded cells appeared to be interneurons and differed from bursting and non-bursting cells in action-potential shape and response to extracellular stimulation. 3. Bursting cells differed from nonbursting cells in their membrane properties: 1) their time constants were typically shorter (averaging 7.4 ms for bursting cells and 11.5 ms for nonbursting cells), 2) they exhibited a pronounced "sag" in the potential response to hyperpolarizing current injection, and 3) they responded at the break of a hyperpolarizing stimulus with a depolarization (anodal break potential). The sag and the anodal break potential were not detected in recordings from nonbursting neurons. 4. A single-spiking mode could be induced in bursting cells by depolarization from resting potential to about -60 mV. Conversely, hyperpolarization of nonbursting cells did not convert them to bursting cells. 5. Both bursting and nonbursting cell types could be antidromically driven. Whereas both excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs and IPSPs) were prominent in nonbursting cells, IPSPs were observed at a lower stimulus intensities than EPSPs in most cells. EPSPs were evident in bursting cells and they triggered burst discharges. IPSPs in bursting cells were detected only when these cells were depolarized, eliminating burst responses. 6. Spontaneous firing rates were low (averaging < 1 spike/s) for both cell types. Addition of picrotoxin produced spontaneous burst or EPSP responses in bursting cells, synchronous with different patterns of picrotoxin-induced population bursts originating in CA3 and/or entorhinal cortex. Individual subicular cells followed CA3 or entorhinal cortex or both. No such activity was recorded in nonbursting cells. No increases in activity in either cell type were seen after picrotoxin application to isolated pieces of subicular cortex.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8395577     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1993.70.1.232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  30 in total

1.  Action potential bursting in subicular pyramidal neurons is driven by a calcium tail current.

Authors:  H Y Jung ; N P Staff; N Spruston
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Control of bursting by local inhibition in the rat subiculum in vitro.

Authors:  L Menendez de la Prida
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Different levels of Ih determine distinct temporal integration in bursting and regular-spiking neurons in rat subiculum.

Authors:  Ingrid van Welie; Michiel W H Remme; Johannes A van Hooft; Wytse J Wadman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Two different forms of long-term potentiation at CA1-subiculum synapses.

Authors:  Christian Wozny; Nikolaus Maier; Dietmar Schmitz; Joachim Behr
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Hippocampal sharp wave-ripple: A cognitive biomarker for episodic memory and planning.

Authors:  György Buzsáki
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.899

6.  The role of T-type calcium channels in the subiculum: to burst or not to burst?

Authors:  Srdjan M Joksimovic; Pierce Eggan; Yukitoshi Izumi; Sonja Lj Joksimovic; Vesna Tesic; Robert M Dietz; James E Orfila; Michael R DiGruccio; Paco S Herson; Vesna Jevtovic-Todorovic; Charles F Zorumski; Slobodan M Todorovic
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Presubicular and parasubicular cortical neurons of the rat: functional separation of deep and superficial neurons in vitro.

Authors:  M Funahashi; M Stewart
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1997-06-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Pro-excitatory alterations in sodium channel activity facilitate subiculum neuron hyperexcitability in temporal lobe epilepsy.

Authors:  Bryan S Barker; Aradhya Nigam; Matteo Ottolini; Ronald P Gaykema; Nicholas J Hargus; Manoj K Patel
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.996

Review 9.  Computer simulation of epilepsy: implications for seizure spread and behavioral dysfunction.

Authors:  William W Lytton; Rena Orman; Mark Stewart
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 2.937

10.  Morpho-physiologic characteristics of dorsal subicular network in mice after pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus.

Authors:  De Fu He; Dong Liang Ma; Yong Cheng Tang; Jerome Engel; Anatol Bragin; Feng Ru Tang
Journal:  Brain Pathol       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 6.508

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.