Literature DB >> 8394915

Agonist and antagonist effects of mixed action opioids in the pigeon drug discrimination procedure: influence of training dose, intrinsic efficacy and interanimal differences.

M J Picker1, J Yarbrough, C E Hughes, M A Smith, D Morgan, L A Dykstra.   

Abstract

The stimulus effects of selective, high efficacy mu opioids and mixed action opioids with varying degrees of intrinsic efficacy at the mu receptor were examined in pigeons trained to discriminate between saline and either 0.056 (low) or 0.18 (high) mg/kg of fentanyl. The stimulus profiles produced by the various opioids could be separated into three groups: 1) opioids that substituted completely for both training doses of fentanyl, with steep slopes and little interanimal differences in the lowest dose (lowest discriminable dose) that produced complete substitution (fentanyl, morphine and l-alpha-acetylmethadol); 2) opioids that substituted completely for the low training dose and produced high levels of substitution for the high training dose, with relatively shallow slopes and interanimal differences in the lowest discriminable dose (butorphanol, buprenorphine, ethylketocyclazocine, ketocyclazocine, proxorphan, (-)-pentazocine and (-)-metazocine); and 3) opioids that substituted completely for the low training dose, with relatively shallow slopes and large interanimal differences in the lowest discriminable dose. Each of these opioids also antagonized the high-dose fentanyl stimulus with large interanimal differences in the lowest antagonist dose (nalbuphine, nalorphine, (-)-cyclorphan, (-)-cyclazocine, (-)-n-ally-normetazocine and levallorphan). These patterns of substitution and antagonism most likely reflect differences in the intrinsic efficacy of these drugs at the mu receptor, with low intrinsic efficacy associated with shallow dose-effect functions, large interanimal differences in the drug's lowest discriminable dose and low levels of substitution for the high-dose fentanyl stimulus. During antagonism tests with naloxone, two patterns were observed: 1) opioids against which naloxone had apparent pA2 values of approximately 7.0, with little interanimal differences and with the slopes of the Schild plots approximating -1.0 (fentanyl and morphine) and 2) opioids against which naloxone had apparent pA2 values an order of magnitude higher, with large interanimal differences and with the slopes of Schild plots being relatively shallow (butorphanol, nalbuphine, nalorphine and levallorphan). The present findings emphasize the importance of training dose, intrinsic efficacy and interanimal differences when analyzing drug discrimination data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8394915

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  12 in total

1.  Drug discrimination in pigeons trained to discriminate among morphine, U50488, a combination of these drugs, and saline.

Authors:  William D Wessinger; Mi Li; Donald E McMillan
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.293

2.  In vivo pharmacological resultant analysis reveals noncompetitive interactions between opioid antagonists in the rat tail-withdrawal assay.

Authors:  E A Walker
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 3.  Human Drug Discrimination: Elucidating the Neuropharmacology of Commonly Abused Illicit Drugs.

Authors:  B Levi Bolin; Joseph L Alcorn; Anna R Reynolds; Joshua A Lile; William W Stoops; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018

4.  In vivo apparent pA2 analysis in rats treated with either clocinnamox or morphine.

Authors:  E A Walker; T M Richardson; A M Young
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Drug Discrimination and the Analysis of Private Events.

Authors:  Brian D Kangas; David R Maguire
Journal:  Behav Anal (Wash D C)       Date:  2016-03-14

6.  Patterns of nicotinic receptor antagonism: nicotine discrimination studies.

Authors:  Emily M Jutkiewicz; Emily A Brooks; Adam D Kynaston; Kenner C Rice; James H Woods
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Effects of the delta opioid against BW373U86 in pigeons trained to discriminate fentanyl, bremazocine and water in a three-choice drug discrimination procedure.

Authors:  S S Negus; D Morgan; C D Cook; M J Picker
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Comparison of intravenous buprenorphine and methadone self-administration by recently detoxified heroin-dependent individuals.

Authors:  Sandra D Comer; Maria A Sullivan; Ellen A Walker
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 4.030

9.  Antagonism of the discriminative stimulus effects of the kappa-opioid agonist spiradoline.

Authors:  S G Holtzman; G F Steinfels
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Interactions between cannabinoid receptor agonists and mu opioid receptor agonists in rhesus monkeys discriminating fentanyl.

Authors:  David R Maguire; Charles P France
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 4.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.