Literature DB >> 8393906

The results of secondary microsurgical repair of ulnar nerve injury.

M Vastamäki1, P K Kallio, K A Solonen.   

Abstract

110 patients with injuries to the ulnar nerve were assessed, on average, 12.7 (3-20) years after secondary repair. 89 were male and 21 female, with a mean age of 27.9 years. Most of the nerve lesions were sharp (63) or blunt (41) injuries. Division was total in 76 cases and most were at the forearm level. The average delay from the injury to the operation was 10.1 (1-48) months. Secondary repair was performed in 34 cases and fascicular grafting in 76 cases. The mean graft length was 5.4 (1-30) cm. Four factors of motor and sensory function were assessed and the quantitative evaluation was compared with the MRC classification. Useful results were obtained in only 51.8% and poor in 30.9%. The age of the patient, the width of contusion, the pre-operative delay, and the level of the injury influenced the results significantly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8393906     DOI: 10.1016/0266-7681(93)90053-i

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Br        ISSN: 0266-7681


  15 in total

Review 1.  [Operative strategies for hand injuries in multiple trauma. A systematic review of the literature].

Authors:  M Schädel-Höpfner; H Siebert
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Ulnar Nerve Injury as a Result of Galeazzi Fracture: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Paul Roettges; Tolga Turker
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-07-13

3.  Management of Iatrogenic Ulnar Nerve Transection.

Authors:  Mark Henry
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2014-06-08

4.  Nerve injuries of the upper extremity associated with vascular trauma-surgical treatment and outcome.

Authors:  Lukas Rasulic; Ilijas Cinara; Miroslav Samardzic; Andrija Savic; Bojana Zivkovic; Filip Vitosevic; Mirko Micovic; Vladimir Bascarevic; Vladimir Puzovic; Stefan Mandic-Rajcevic
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Comparison of ulnar nerve repair according to injury level and type.

Authors:  Hakan Basar; Betül Basar; Bülent Erol; Cihangir Tetik
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Peripheral Nerve Recovery in a Rat Sciatic Nerve Injury Model.

Authors:  Angel F Farinas; Isaac V Manzanera Esteve; Alonda C Pollins; Nancy L Cardwell; Christodoulos Kaoutzanis; Marlieke E Nussenbaum; Mark D Does; Richard D Dortch; Galen Perdikis; Wesley P Thayer
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Recent advances and developments in neural repair and regeneration for hand surgery.

Authors:  Mukai Chimutengwende-Gordon; Wasim Khan
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2012-02-23

8.  Modelling-informed cell-seeded nerve repair construct designs for treating peripheral nerve injuries.

Authors:  Rachel Coy; Maxime Berg; James B Phillips; Rebecca J Shipley
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Outcome following nerve repair of high isolated clean sharp injuries of the ulnar nerve.

Authors:  René Post; Kornelis S de Boer; Martijn J A Malessy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Factors predicting sensory and motor recovery after the repair of upper limb peripheral nerve injuries.

Authors:  Bo He; Zhaowei Zhu; Qingtang Zhu; Xiang Zhou; Canbin Zheng; Pengliang Li; Shuang Zhu; Xiaolin Liu; Jiakai Zhu
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 5.135

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.