E Moy1, C Hogan. 1. Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We developed a new approach to measuring access to care that examines post-hospitalization follow-up care. It reveals differences in receipt of follow-up care among different subsets of the Medicare population. METHODS: Medicare administrative databases from 1986, 1988, and 1990 were used to construct three retrospective cohorts. Each cohort consisted of patients from a random 1% sample of Medicare beneficiaries admitted with selected conditions that almost always require timely follow-up care. Various "vulnerable populations" within these cohorts were defined on the basis of age, sex, race, and other demographic factors. Merged outpatient records were used to determine receipt of postdischarge follow-up physician services, follow-up services in outpatient departments, and any follow-up care for these different Medicare populations. RESULTS: Beneficiaries aged 85 years or older, black beneficiaries, Medicaid/Qualified Medicare Beneficiaries, residents of urban core counties, residents of the highest-poverty ZIP codes, and residents of Health Professional Shortage Areas were less likely to receive follow-up physician services. Beneficiaries aged 85 years or older, black beneficiaries, residents of the highest-poverty ZIP codes, and residents of Health Professional Shortage Areas were less likely to receive any follow-up care. CONCLUSIONS: This method identified some Medicare populations who failed to receive needed follow-up services, suggesting problems with access to care. This method may be useful in tracking changes in access under the new Medicare fee schedule.
BACKGROUND: We developed a new approach to measuring access to care that examines post-hospitalization follow-up care. It reveals differences in receipt of follow-up care among different subsets of the Medicare population. METHODS: Medicare administrative databases from 1986, 1988, and 1990 were used to construct three retrospective cohorts. Each cohort consisted of patients from a random 1% sample of Medicare beneficiaries admitted with selected conditions that almost always require timely follow-up care. Various "vulnerable populations" within these cohorts were defined on the basis of age, sex, race, and other demographic factors. Merged outpatient records were used to determine receipt of postdischarge follow-up physician services, follow-up services in outpatient departments, and any follow-up care for these different Medicare populations. RESULTS: Beneficiaries aged 85 years or older, black beneficiaries, Medicaid/Qualified Medicare Beneficiaries, residents of urban core counties, residents of the highest-poverty ZIP codes, and residents of Health Professional Shortage Areas were less likely to receive follow-up physician services. Beneficiaries aged 85 years or older, black beneficiaries, residents of the highest-poverty ZIP codes, and residents of Health Professional Shortage Areas were less likely to receive any follow-up care. CONCLUSIONS: This method identified some Medicare populations who failed to receive needed follow-up services, suggesting problems with access to care. This method may be useful in tracking changes in access under the new Medicare fee schedule.