Literature DB >> 8392761

The long persistence of CMV DNA in the blood of renal transplant patients after recovery from CMV infection.

A Bitsch1, H Kirchner, R Dennin, J Hoyer, L Fricke, J Steinhoff, K Sack, G Bein.   

Abstract

A total of 30-50% of all renal transplant recipients undergo infections caused by human cytomegalovirus. With the introduction of ganciclovir and foscarnet for specific antiviral therapy there is an increasing demand for diagnostic tools that allow the early and rapid identification of CMV as the causative agent of the observed disease. We and others previously showed the direct detection of pp65 antigen in peripheral blood leukocytes to be an excellent marker for active cytomegalovirus infection. In order to establish whether the detection of CMV DNA by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) supplies further information in this regard, we compared both methods. In 41 renal transplant patients the PCR assay yielded a sensitivity of 100% compared with 87.5% of the antigenemia assay. Specificities reached 67% and 92.5%, respectively. In 5 patients without both serological signs of infection and antigenemia, CMV DNA was also found. The duration of CMV DNA detection in PBL during active infection was significantly longer than antigenemia. Even after successful treatment of symptomatic CMV disease, DNA was present for a period of weeks without any relapse of disease. In contrast, antigenemia disappeared after antiviral therapy and reappeared only in one patient with relapse of CMV disease. We conclude that PCR offers no advantages over antigen detection in monitoring for CMV infections after renal transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8392761     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199307000-00020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  6 in total

1.  Enhanced analytical sensitivity of a quantitative PCR for CMV using a modified nucleic-acid extraction procedure.

Authors:  A Ferreira-Gonzalez; S Yanovich; M R Langley; L A Weymouth; D S Wilkinson; C T Garrett
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 2.  Management of cytomegalovirus infection after solid-organ or stem-cell transplantation. Current guidelines and future prospects.

Authors:  H Hebart; L Kanz; G Jahn; H Einsele
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Peripheral blood leukocytes and serum nested polymerase chain reaction are complementary methods for monitoring active cytomegalovirus infection in transplant patients.

Authors:  Pd Andrade; Mt Fioravanti; Ebv Anjos; C De Oliveira; Dm Albuquerque; Scb Costa
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.471

4.  Evaluation of the PrimeCapture CMV DNA detection plate system for detection of cytomegalovirus in clinical specimens.

Authors:  E H Davoli; S M Lipson; M E Match; D H Shepp; J W Morin; D M Curley
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Utility of major leukocyte subpopulations for monitoring secondary cytomegalovirus infections in renal-allograft recipients by PCR.

Authors:  P Schäfer; W Tenschert; L Cremaschi; K Gutensohn; R Laufs
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Cellular responses to cytomegalovirus in immunosuppressed patients: circulating CD8+ T cells recognizing CMVpp65 are present but display functional impairment.

Authors:  M Engstrand; A K Lidehall; T H Totterman; B Herrman; B-M Eriksson; O Korsgren
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.330

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.