Literature DB >> 8391765

Diagnosis of persistent aphthovirus infection and its differentiation from vaccination response in cattle by use of enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot analysis with bioengineered nonstructural viral antigens.

I E Bergmann1, P A de Mello, E Neitzert, E Beck, I Gomes.   

Abstract

A highly sensitive enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot (EITB) assay, capable of detecting aphthovirus-specific antibodies to replicating virus in sera from cattle with persistent infection, was developed. The assay uses a set of purified recombinant DNA-derived nonstructural viral antigens as serologic probes in lieu of the traditionally used virus infection-associated antigen(s) partially purified from baby hamster kidney-infected cells. Sera from cattle with experimentally induced aphthovirus infection were analyzed sequentially by EITB at various postinoculation days, and the results were compared with those obtained by currently used techniques. It was established that, in all cases, EITB results remained positive at late stages of infection. At these times, results of virus infection-associated antigen-antibody determinations were negative by use of the conventional immunodiffusion in agarose gel test, and virus was recovered only occasionally from esophageal-pharyngeal fluid. Specificity of the EITB test was indicated by negative results for sera from cattle in aphthovirus-free areas, including samples from cattle infected with a variety of bovine viruses. Moreover, the test eliminated a substantial number of false-positive results (on the basis of the immunodiffusion in agarose gel assay) caused by reactivity of sera from vaccinated cattle. Use of additional nonstructural viral antigens, other than RNA polymerase, is proposed to differentiate between seropositivity resulting from vaccination or infection. This procedure may be considered to have potential applications as a sensitive, safe, rapid, and economic field test for specific diagnosis of persistent aphthovirus infection in affected animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8391765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Vet Res        ISSN: 0002-9645            Impact factor:   1.156


  13 in total

Review 1.  Foot-and-mouth disease.

Authors:  Marvin J Grubman; Barry Baxt
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Epitope mapping of monoclonal antibodies raised to recombinant Mengo 3D polymerase.

Authors:  H Duque; A C Palmenberg
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.332

3.  Foot-and-mouth disease in Southern Ghana: occurrence and molecular characterization of circulating viruses.

Authors:  Mathias V Teye; Teresa K Sebunya; Elliot M Fana; Donald P King; LaToya Seoke; Nick J Knowles; Joseph A Awuni; George Matlho; Melvin Leteane; Joseph M K Hyera
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Serological survey for foot-and-mouth disease virus in wildlife in eastern Africa and estimation of test parameters of a nonstructural protein enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for buffalo.

Authors:  B M D C Bronsvoort; S Parida; I Handel; S McFarland; L Fleming; P Hamblin; R Kock
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2008-04-02

5.  Expression of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Non-Structural Protein, 3D in Insect Cells and its Application in Detection of Anti-FMDV Antibodies.

Authors:  Rakesh Kumar; M Hosamani; B P Sreenivasa; Anil Kotyal; R Venkataramanan
Journal:  Indian J Virol       Date:  2012-09-06

6.  Differentiation of foot-and-mouth disease virus-infected from vaccinated pigs by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using nonstructural protein 3AB as the antigen and application to an eradication program.

Authors:  Wen-Bin Chung; Karl Johan Sorensen; Pei-Chih Liao; Pin-Cheng Yang; Ming-Hwa Jong
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of two 3ABC enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for diagnosis of multiple-serotype foot-and-mouth disease in a cattle population in an area of endemicity.

Authors:  B M de C Bronsvoort; K J Sørensen; J Anderson; A Corteyn; V N Tanya; R P Kitching; K L Morgan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  A safe foot-and-mouth disease vaccine platform with two negative markers for differentiating infected from vaccinated animals.

Authors:  Sabena Uddowla; Jason Hollister; Juan M Pacheco; Luis L Rodriguez; Elizabeth Rieder
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Evaluation of three 3ABC ELISAs for foot-and-mouth disease non-structural antibodies using latent class analysis.

Authors:  Barend M deC Bronsvoort; Nils Toft; Ingrid E Bergmann; Karl-Johan Sørensen; John Anderson; Viviane Malirat; Vincent N Tanya; Kenton L Morgan
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 10.  Foot-and-mouth disease: past, present and future.

Authors:  Syed M Jamal; Graham J Belsham
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.683

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.