Literature DB >> 839049

Replantation of digits and hands: analysis of surgical techniques and functional results in 71 patients with 86 replantations.

A J Weiland, A Villarreal-Rios, H E Kleinert, J Kutz, E Atasoy, G Lister.   

Abstract

Defining replantation as the restoration of a completely amputated part as opposed to simply restoring circulation to an incompletely severed part, the results of replantation of 86 completely amputated parts in 71 patients performed from January, 1970, to December, 1975, were studied. Twenty-eight, or 32.5 percent, were the result of sharp severances of the part; localized crushing accounted for 56, or 65.1 percent. Two were classified as degloving injuries. Twelve amputations were transmetacarpal, six were at the metacarpophalangeal joints, 14 through the proximal phalanx, 15 at the proximal interphalangeal joint, 21 in the middle phalanx, 13 at the distal interphalangeal joint, and five through the distal phalanx. The technique consisted of bone shortening and fixation and repair of all tendons and nerves if possible. Veins are repaired first, at least two for each artery, and heparinized saline and lidocaine are used locally. Irrigation of the vessels is not done, but an intravenous bolus of 3,000 U. of heparin is given when the anastomoses are completed. Aspirin and low molecular weight dextran are given for 3 to 7 days. For the more distal replantation, heparin may be used. Antibiotics are given. In the total series of 86 completely amputated hand units, 52 were unsuccessful, primarly due to vascular thrombosis and usually on the venous side. In the year 1975 a success rate of 69.2 percent was achieved, whereas in the last 50 replantations, done between Jan. 1, 1976, and Oct. 15, 1976, the success rate was 90 percent. Results improved with more experience in the technique and with more careful selection of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 839049     DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(77)80002-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  17 in total

Review 1.  Progress in free tissue transfer.

Authors:  B M O'Brien; P A Kumar
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Upper extremity and digital replantation.

Authors:  Marco Maricevich; Brian Carlsen; Samir Mardini; Steven Moran
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2011-08-04

Review 3.  A systematic review of the outcomes of replantation of distal digital amputation.

Authors:  Sandeep J Sebastin; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  A review of five years experience of digital replantation.

Authors:  N Waterhouse
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  History of replantation: from miracle to microsurgery.

Authors:  M S Kocher
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  [Preservation and reconstruction of the thumb with the aid of microvascular surgery (author's transl)].

Authors:  H Piza-Katzer; A Berger; V Vécsei
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie       Date:  1981

7.  Replantation.

Authors:  B Jones; P Smith; D Harrison
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-07-02

8.  Major limb, hand, and digital replantation.

Authors:  S Tamai; Y Hori; Y Tatsumi; H Okuda; Y Nakamura; H Sakamoto; T Takita
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1979-06-11       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Annual Hospital Volume and Success of Digital Replantation.

Authors:  Matthew Brown; Yiwen Lu; Kevin C Chung; Elham Mahmoudi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Classification and evaluation of the functional results of replanted parts of the hand at the Prince of Wales Hospital and the Prince of Wales Children's Hospital: 1984 to 1988.

Authors:  B C Milroy; R P Sackelariou; P G Lendvay; M R Baldwin; M McGlynn
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.