Literature DB >> 8390375

Can severe male factor infertility be treated without micromanipulation?

T Ord1, P Patrizio, J P Balmaceda, R H Asch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To present data on IVF in severe male factor infertility using modified IVF laboratory methods and to compare them with the reported data of gamete micromanipulation.
DESIGN: Retrospective, not randomized.
SETTING: University of California, Irvine, Center for Reproductive Health. PATIENTS: Seventy-one patients with severe oligoasthenozoospermia defined as total motile count in the pretreatment sample of < 5 x 10(6). Two groups were identified, group I with total motile count between 1.5 and 5 x 10(6) and group II with total motile count < 1.5 x 10(6).
INTERVENTIONS: Treatment of the semen samples with mini-Percoll and the modification of standard IVF techniques. These modifications include insemination with larger numbers of sperm, the use of culture tubes for insemination of oocytes, and pooling oocytes together in one or more culture tubes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fertilization and pregnancy rates (PRs). Additionally, the number of patients achieving cryopreservation and patients with previous failure to fertilize are specified.
RESULTS: Eighty percent of the patients achieved fertilization with an overall rate of 38% per oocyte. Fifty-three ETs were performed and 23 clinical pregnancies (43% per transfer and 35% per cycle) were achieved. Fifty percent of the patients had excess embryos for cryopreservation. In group I the fertilization rate was 54% with a PR of 56% per transfer and 48% per cycle. In group II the fertilization rate was 25% with a PR per transfer of 32% and 24% per cycle. Of 28 patients who had previous failure of fertilization, 25 fertilized and 8 pregnancies were established.
CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that by the modification of standard laboratory methods for IVF, monospermic fertilization, cleavage, and a high clinical PR can be achieved in cases of severe male factor infertility without having to resort to micromanipulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8390375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  5 in total

1.  Impact of fertilization history and semen parameters on ICSI outcome.

Authors:  R Mercan; S Oehninger; S J Muasher; J P Toner; J Mayer; S E Lanzendorf
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Subzonal insemination (SUZI) or in vitro fertilization (IVF) in microdroplets for the treatment of male-factor infertility.

Authors:  P Svalander; M Wikland; A H Jakobsson; A S Forsberg
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Microsurgical fertilization: world survey, 1993.

Authors:  Y Tadir
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Isolated teratozoospermia and in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  H Figueiredo; A Tavares; L Ferrás; A Couceiro; I Chaves
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Sperm stimulants can improve fertilization rates in male-factor cases undergoing IVF to the same extent as micromanipulation by partial zona dissection (PZD) or subzonal sperm insemination (SUZI): a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  W R Edirisinghe; S Junk; J M Yovich; B Bootsma; J L Yovich
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.412

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.