Literature DB >> 8388788

Restriction landmark genomic scanning method and its various applications.

Y Hayashizaki1, S Hirotsune, Y Okazaki, I Hatada, H Shibata, J Kawai, K Hirose, S Watanabe, S Fushiki, S Wada.   

Abstract

We have developed a new genome scanning method (restriction landmark genomic scanning (RLGS), based on the new concept of using restriction enzyme sites as landmarks. RLGS employs direct end labeling of the genomic DNA digested with a restriction enzyme and two-dimensional electrophoresis with high-resolution. Its advantages are: (i) high-speed scanning ability, allowing simultaneous scanning of thousands of restriction landmarks; (ii) extension of the scanning field using different kinds of landmarks in an additional series of electrophoresis; (iii) application to any type of organism because of direct-labeling of restriction enzyme sites and no hybridization procedure; and (iv) reflection of the copy number of the restriction landmark by the spot intensity which enables distinction of haploid and diploid genomic DNAs. The RLGS method has various applications because it can be used to scan for physical genomic DNA states, such as amplification, deletion and methylation. The copy number of the locus of a restriction landmark can be estimated by the spot intensity to find either an amplified or deleted region. The methylation state of genomic DNA can also be discovered by use of a methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme sites as a restriction landmark (restriction landmark genomic scanning for screening methylated sites, RLGS-M). This article introduces the basic principle of RLGS and its applications to the analysis of cancer, mouse mutant DNAs and tissue-specific methylation, showing the usefulness of RLGS for a variety of biological fields.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8388788     DOI: 10.1002/elps.1150140145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electrophoresis        ISSN: 0173-0835            Impact factor:   3.535


  30 in total

1.  Association of tissue-specific differentially methylated regions (TDMs) with differential gene expression.

Authors:  Fei Song; Joseph F Smith; Makoto T Kimura; Arlene D Morrow; Tomoki Matsuyama; Hiroki Nagase; William A Held
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  High-resolution genomic profiling of chromosomal aberrations using Infinium whole-genome genotyping.

Authors:  Daniel A Peiffer; Jennie M Le; Frank J Steemers; Weihua Chang; Tony Jenniges; Francisco Garcia; Kirt Haden; Jiangzhen Li; Chad A Shaw; John Belmont; Sau Wai Cheung; Richard M Shen; David L Barker; Kevin L Gunderson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  19th International Mouse Genome Conference.

Authors:  Nicola M Solomon; Jennifer Dackor; Sally A Camper
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.957

4.  Survey of differentially methylated promoters in prostate cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Yipeng Wang; Qiuju Yu; Ann H Cho; Gaelle Rondeau; John Welsh; Eileen Adamson; Dan Mercola; Michael McClelland
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 5.  Principles and challenges of genomewide DNA methylation analysis.

Authors:  Peter W Laird
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Restriction landmark cDNA scanning (RLCS): a novel cDNA display system using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  H Suzuki; T Yaoi; J Kawai; A Hara; G Kuwajima; S Wantanabe
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1996-01-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 7.  Identifying 5-methylcytosine and related modifications in DNA genomes.

Authors:  T Rein; M L DePamphilis; H Zorbas
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  A unique downregulation of h2-calponin gene expression in Down syndrome: a possible attenuation mechanism for fetal survival by methylation at the CpG island in the trisomic chromosome 21.

Authors:  J Kuromitsu; H Yamashita; H Kataoka; T Takahara; M Muramatsu; T Sekine; N Okamoto; Y Furuichi; Y Hayashizaki
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Maps of cis-Regulatory Nodes in Megabase Long Genome Segments are an Inevitable Intermediate Step Toward Whole Genome Functional Mapping.

Authors:  Lev G Nikolaev; Sergey B Akopov; Igor P Chernov; Eugene D Sverdlov
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.236

10.  The application of restriction landmark genome scanning method for surveillance of non-mendelian inheritance in f(1) hybrids.

Authors:  Tomoko Takamiya; Saeko Hosobuchi; Tomotsugu Noguchi; Andrew H Paterson; Hiroshi Iijima; Yasufumi Murakami; Hisato Okuizumi
Journal:  Comp Funct Genomics       Date:  2010-01-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.