Literature DB >> 8388584

The influence of HLA matching on cytomegalovirus hepatitis and chronic rejection after liver transplantation.

R Mañez1, L T White, P Linden, S Kusne, M Martin, D Kramer, A J Demetris, D H Van Thiel, T E Starzl, R J Duquesnoy.   

Abstract

Previous findings in liver transplantation patients have raised the concept that HLA plays a dualistic role. HLA matching will reduce rejection but may augment MHC restricted cellular immune mechanisms of liver allograft injury. To evaluate this concept, we studied CMV hepatitis in 399 FK506-treated liver transplant patients, including 355 cases for which complete HLA-A,B,DR,DQ typing information was available. CMV hepatitis developed in 25 patients, and 17 of them (or 68%) showed a one or two HLA-DR antigen match with the donor. In contrast, HLA-DR matches were found in only 35% of 330 patients without CMV hepatitis (P = 0.005). No significant associations were seen for HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DQ antigens. In pretransplant CMV-seronegative patients with seropositive grafts (n = 39), the frequency of CMV hepatitis was 44% for HLA-DR-matched livers but 14% for HLA-DR-unmatched livers. In seropositive recipients (n = 187), these frequencies were 12% and 2% for HLA-DR-matched and unmatched liver grafts. Chronic rejection developed in 29 patients (or 8%) during a follow-up between 10 and 24 months after transplantation. Its incidence was higher in the CMV hepatitis group (24% vs. 6%) (P = 0.007). Although no associations were found between HLA matching and the incidence of chronic rejection, there was an earlier onset of chronic rejection of HLA-DR-matched livers irrespective of CMV hepatitis. These findings suggest that an HLA-DR match between donor and recipient increases the incidence of CMV hepatitis in both primary and secondary CMV infections. Although HLA compatibility leads to less acute cellular rejection, it is suggested that DR matching may accelerate chronic rejection of liver transplants, perhaps through HLA-DR-restricted immunological mechanisms toward viral antigens, including CMV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8388584      PMCID: PMC3091368          DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199305000-00024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  29 in total

1.  HLA class II restriction of T helper cell response to cytomegalovirus (CMV). I. Immunogenetic control of restriction.

Authors:  R C Gehrz; S Fuad; Y N Liu; F H Bach
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1987-05-15       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  HLA-DR-restricted cytotoxicity of cytomegalovirus-infected monocytes mediated by Leu-3-positive T cells.

Authors:  M D Lindsley; D J Torpey; C R Rinaldo
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1986-04-15       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  Dw subtypes of serologically defined DR-DQ specificities restrict recognition of cytomegalovirus.

Authors:  K M Linner; C Monroy; F H Bach; R C Gehrz
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 2.850

4.  An analysis of cytomegalovirus infection and HLA antigen matching on the outcome of renal transplantation.

Authors:  A G May; R F Betts; R B Freeman; C H Andrus
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  HLA-restricted cytotoxic T lymphocyte and nonthymic cytotoxic lymphocyte responses to cytomegalovirus infection of bone marrow transplant recipients.

Authors:  G V Quinnan; N Kirmani; E Esber; R Saral; J F Manischewitz; J L Rogers; A H Rook; G W Santos; W H Burns
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Cytotoxic t cells in cytomegalovirus infection: HLA-restricted T-lymphocyte and non-T-lymphocyte cytotoxic responses correlate with recovery from cytomegalovirus infection in bone-marrow-transplant recipients.

Authors:  G V Quinnan; N Kirmani; A H Rook; J F Manischewitz; L Jackson; G Moreschi; G W Santos; R Saral; W H Burns
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-07-01       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  HLA-restricted cytotoxic T lymphocytes are an early immune response and important defense mechanism in cytomegalovirus infections.

Authors:  G V Quinnan; W H Burns; N Kirmani; A H Rook; J Manischewitz; L Jackson; G W Santos; R Saral
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr

8.  Evidence for an immune response to HLA class I antigens in the vanishing-bileduct syndrome after liver transplantation.

Authors:  P T Donaldson; G J Alexander; J O'Grady; J Neuberger; B Portmann; M Thick; H Davis; R Y Calne; R Williams
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-04-25       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Conversion of liver allograft recipients from cyclosporine to FK506 immunosuppressive therapy--a clinicopathologic study of 96 patients.

Authors:  A J Demetris; J J Fung; S Todo; J McCauley; A Jain; S Takaya; M Alessiani; K Abu-Elmagd; D H Van Thiel; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Role of specific cytotoxic lymphocytes in cellular immunity against murine cytomegalovirus.

Authors:  M Ho
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 3.441

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Chronic rejection. A general overview of histopathology and pathophysiology with emphasis on liver, heart and intestinal allografts.

Authors:  A J Demetris; N Murase; R G Lee; P Randhawa; A Zeevi; S Pham; R Duquesnoy; J J Fung; T E Starzl
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.530

2.  Pathology of Chronic Rejection: An Overview of Common Findings and Observations About Pathogenic Mechanisms and Possible Prevention.

Authors:  A J Demetris; N Murase; T E Starzl; J J Fung
Journal:  Graft (Georget Tex)       Date:  1998-05

3.  Risk factors for liver rejection: evidence to suggest enhanced allograft tolerance in infancy.

Authors:  M S Murphy; R Harrison; P Davies; J A Buckels; A D Mayer; S Hubscher; D A Kelly
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Does tacrolimus offer virtual freedom from chronic rejection after primary liver transplantation? Risk and prognostic factors in 1,048 liver transplantations with a mean follow-up of 6 years.

Authors:  A Jain; A J Demetris; R Kashyap; K Blakomer; K Ruppert; A Khan; S Rohal; T E Starzl; J J Fung
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 5.  Modulation of major histocompatibility complex antigen expression by viral infection.

Authors:  C R Rinaldo
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 6.  The liver allograft, chronic (ductopenic) rejection, and microchimerism: what can they teach us?

Authors:  A J Demetris; N Murase; C P Delaney; M Woan; J J Fung; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.066

7.  The influence of HLA donor-recipient compatibility on the recurrence of HBV and HCV hepatitis after liver transplantation.

Authors:  R Mañez; R Mateo; J Tabasco; S Kusne; T E Starzl; R J Duquesnoy
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1995-02-27       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Posttransplant B, non-A non-B, and cytomegalovirus hepatitis increase the risk of developing chronic rejection after liver transplantation.

Authors:  O Bronsther; R Mañez; S Kusne; W Irish; W Roland; A Jain; R Llull; A J Demetris; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 9.  Cytomegalovirus and chronic allograft rejection in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Liang-Hui Gao; Shu-Sen Zheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  A novel dermal matrix generated from burned skin as a promising substitute for deep-degree burns therapy.

Authors:  Guanying Yu; Lan Ye; Wei Tan; Xuguo Zhu; Yaonan Li; Duyin Jiang
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.