Literature DB >> 8386921

Comparative effects of different antihypertensive treatments on progression of diabetic renal disease.

R Slataper1, N Vicknair, R Sadler, G L Bakris.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Given the same level of arterial pressure control, studies in diabetic animal models have demonstrated certain classes of antihypertensive medication to confer better overall preservation of renal histologic features and function as well as reduced albuminuria when compared with other agents. The present study was designed to assess whether any differences exist among antihypertensive agents with regard to progression of diabetic renal disease and albuminuria in human subjects.
METHODS: The study was a randomized, prospective, parallel group design that evaluated the effects of a converting enzyme inhibitor (lisinopril; group 1), a calcium antagonist (diltiazem hydrochloride; group 2), and a combination of a loop diuretic and a beta-blocker (furosemide and atenolol; group 3) in 30 subjects. All subjects received a low-salt, low-protein diet. Metabolic (blood glucose, cholesterol profiles, and urine urea nitrogen and sodium levels) as well as renal hemodynamic (renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate) profiles and arterial pressure measurements were performed at various intervals during an 18-month period.
RESULTS: Both groups 1 and 2 had significantly slower rates of decline in glomerular filtration rate compared with group 3. No significant differences were observed in renal hemodynamics between groups 1 and 2 at 18 months. Group 3 had the worst metabolic, lipid, and side-effect profile of any group. Reductions in albuminuria were not different between groups 1 and 2, but both were significantly reduced compared with group 3.
CONCLUSIONS: Given a similar level of arterial pressure control, both lisinopril and diltiazem slow progression of diabetic renal disease and reduce albuminuria to a greater extent than does the combination of a loop diuretic and beta-adrenoreceptor antagonist. These drugs were also better tolerated and produced no adverse metabolic effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8386921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  21 in total

1.  Issues of clinical trial design and data interpretations in hypertension.

Authors:  L H Kuller
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Why beta-blockers are not cardioprotective in elderly patients with hypertension.

Authors:  Ehud Grossman; Franz H Messerli
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Diabetic nephropathy. Its relationship to hypertension and means of pharmacological intervention.

Authors:  T Baba; S Neugebauer; T Watanabe
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Proteinuria reduction: mandatory consideration or option when selecting an antihypertensive agent?

Authors:  Robert D Toto
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 5.  Cost-effective therapy for hypertension.

Authors:  W Barrie
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1996-04

Review 6.  At risk nephrons and the decline in renal function in response to treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  W G Walker; C Ford
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  1996

Review 7.  Lisinopril. A review of its pharmacology and use in the management of the complications of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  K L Goa; M Haria; M I Wilde
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Report of the Canadian Hypertension Society Consensus Conference: 5. Hypertension and diabetes.

Authors:  K G Dawson; J K McKenzie; S A Ross; J L Chiasson; P Hamet
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 9.  Renoprotective role of ACE inhibitors in diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  C E Mogensen
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-09

Review 10.  Cost-effective strategies in the prevention of diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  Jonathan D Rippin; Anthony H Barnett; Stephen C Bain
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.