Literature DB >> 8385008

Chemical and kinetic mechanism of the inositol monophosphatase reaction and its inhibition by Li+.

A P Leech1, G R Baker, J K Shute, M A Cohen, D Gani.   

Abstract

Lithium-sensitive inositol monophosphatase from bovine brain was purified from brain and from a recombinant strain of Escherichia coli BL21-DE3. The natural and recombinant enzymes displayed identical physical and kinetic properties. At low [Li+], Li+ inhibited the hydrolysis of racemic myo-inositol 1-phosphate, myo-inositol 4-phosphate and adenosine 2'-phosphate in a linear uncompetitive manner with apparent Ki values of 1.1, 0.11 and 1.52 mM, respectively. At Li+ concentrations higher than 4 mM, Li+ acted as a non-linear noncompetitive inhibitor for myo-inositol 1-phosphate, Ki greater than 1.5 mM. The enzyme was unable to catalyze the transesterification of [14C]inositol in the presence of inositol 1-phosphate or adenosine 2'-phosphate and attempts to trap a phosphorylated enzyme intermediate directly, were unsuccessful. In the presence of Li+, the enzyme was able to release inositol from inositol 1-phosphate, in a burst, faster than the rate of steady-state substrate turnover suggesting that Li+ binds after P-O bond cleavage in the substrate has occurred. The possibility that a free phosphorylated enzyme intermediate might exist was discounted when the exchange of 18O from [18O] water into phosphate was shown to be completely dependent upon inositol. The Km for inositol for 18O exchange was 190 mM and in the presence of saturating phosphate, VEx was at least 60% of Vmax for the hydrolysis reaction. Thus, the enzyme operates via a ternary-complex mechanism, and Li+ exerts its action by binding to enzyme/product complexes. At low concentration, Li+ inhibition with respect to the cofactor, Mg2+ was non-competitive. Mg2+ acted as a non-competitive activator for substrate hydrolysis at pH 8.0, but as the second substrate in an equilibrium-ordered mechanism at pH 6.5. Cooperativity effects were observed for Mg2+ with inositol 1-phosphate and 2'AMP as the substrate but not with inositol 4-phosphate. The combined results indicate that Mg2+ and substrate binding is ordered with substrate adding first. Inositol, the first product off, was a poor non-competitive inhibitor for inositol 1-phosphate whereas the other product, phosphate, was a competitive inhibitor. Phosphate inhibition was markedly pH dependent (Ki = 8 mM at pH 6.5 and 0.32 mM at pH 8.0). In the presence of Li+ and phosphate, increasing [Li+] caused the Ki for phosphate to decrease by a factor of (1 + [Li+]/KLi). The Ki for the first product off (inositol) was, however, unaltered by Li+. The results indicate that Li+ can bind to the species E.Ins.Pi and E.Pi, but not to enzyme/substrate complexes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8385008     DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb17707.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Biochem        ISSN: 0014-2956


  20 in total

1.  Characterization of a tetrameric inositol monophosphatase from the hyperthermophilic bacterium Thermotoga maritima.

Authors:  L Chen; M F Roberts
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Pharmacogenetics in model systems: defining a common mechanism of action for mood stabilisers.

Authors:  Robin S B Williams
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.067

3.  Mobile loop mutations in an archaeal inositol monophosphatase: modulating three-metal ion assisted catalysis and lithium inhibition.

Authors:  Zheng Li; Kimberly A Stieglitz; Anthony L Shrout; Yang Wei; Robert M Weis; Boguslaw Stec; Mary F Roberts
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  The missing link in plant histidine biosynthesis: Arabidopsis myoinositol monophosphatase-like2 encodes a functional histidinol-phosphate phosphatase.

Authors:  Lindsay N Petersen; Sandra Marineo; Salvatore Mandalà; Faezah Davids; Bryan T Sewell; Robert A Ingle
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 5.  Wnt and lithium: a common destiny in the therapy of nervous system pathologies?

Authors:  Delphine Meffre; Julien Grenier; Sophie Bernard; Françoise Courtin; Todor Dudev; Ghjuvan'Ghjacumu Shackleford; Mehrnaz Jafarian-Tehrani; Charbel Massaad
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2013-06-09       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  Effects of valproic acid derivatives on inositol trisphosphate depletion, teratogenicity, glycogen synthase kinase-3beta inhibition, and viral replication: a screening approach for new bipolar disorder drugs derived from the valproic acid core structure.

Authors:  B J Eickholt; G J Towers; W J Ryves; D Eikel; K Adley; L M J Ylinen; N H Chadborn; A J Harwood; H Nau; R S B Williams
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 4.436

7.  Structural and biochemical characterization of the type II fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase GlpX from Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Greg Brown; Alexander Singer; Vladimir V Lunin; Michael Proudfoot; Tatiana Skarina; Robert Flick; Samvel Kochinyan; Ruslan Sanishvili; Andrzej Joachimiak; Aled M Edwards; Alexei Savchenko; Alexander F Yakunin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Structural Studies of Medicago truncatula Histidinol Phosphate Phosphatase from Inositol Monophosphatase Superfamily Reveal Details of Penultimate Step of Histidine Biosynthesis in Plants.

Authors:  Milosz Ruszkowski; Zbigniew Dauter
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) inositol monophosphatase: gene structure and enzyme characteristics.

Authors:  Jianming Fu; Kevin Peterson; Mary Guttieri; Edward Souza; Victor Raboy
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 4.076

10.  Cloning and expression of the inositol monophosphatase gene from Methanococcus jannaschii and characterization of the enzyme.

Authors:  L Chen; M F Roberts
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.