Literature DB >> 8383933

Hemodynamic and pharmacodynamic comparison of doxacurium and pipecuronium with pancuronium during induction of cardiac anesthesia: does the benefit justify the cost?

J P Rathmell1, R F Brooker, R C Prielipp, J F Butterworth, G P Gravlee.   

Abstract

We compared the pharmacodynamic effects and hospital costs of three long-acting neuromuscular blocking drugs in a prospective, randomized, double-blind manner. Each neuromuscular blocking drug was administered with fentanyl (50 micrograms/kg) for intravenous induction of anesthesia for coronary artery bypass surgery. Each patient received twice the 95% effective dose (ED95) of either pancuronium (0.14 mg/kg, n = 10), pipecuronium (0.10 mg/kg, n = 10), or doxacurium (0.05 mg/kg, n = 10). Hemodynamic measurements were recorded at baseline, 5 min after completion of anesthetic induction, immediately after endotracheal intubation, and 5 min after intubation. Only small hemodynamic differences between neuromuscular blocking drugs were observed. Doxacurium (but not pancuronium or pipecuronium) significantly decreased mean arterial blood pressure (from 94 +/- 4 mm Hg before induction to 83 +/- 3 mm Hg 5 min after intubation); nevertheless, there were no significant between-group differences at any time. Pancuronium increased heart rate (from 68 +/- 4 beats/min before induction to 76 +/- 5 beats/min 5 min after intubation); however, pancuronium differed significantly from doxacurium and pipecuronium only 5 min after induction and 5 min after intubation. Central venous pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, cardiac index, and systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance indices did not change. Electrocardiographic abnormalities were observed in two pipecuronium patients: ST segment depression in one and premature ventricular contractions in another. No other electrocardiographic changes were observed. There were no significant between-group differences in the need for hemodynamic interventions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8383933     DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199303000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  7 in total

1.  Anaesthesia pharmacoeconomics.

Authors:  D R Bevan
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 2.  Intravenous infusion anaesthesia and delivery devices.

Authors:  D R Miller
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Are "clean" muscle relaxants better?

Authors:  I R Thomson
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Evaluation of cost minimization strategies of anaesthetic drugs in a tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  C Hawkes; D Miller; R Martineau; K Hull; H Hopkins; M Tierney
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 5.  Cost comparisons of pharmacological strategies in open-heart surgery.

Authors:  Prabashni Reddy; Jessica Song
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Pharmacodynamics of doxacurium during cardiac surgery with hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  P McDonagh; J Y Dupuis; M Curran; J Kitts; J E Wynands
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 7.  Pharmacology, selection and complications associated with neuromuscular blocking drugs in ICU patients.

Authors:  R C Prielipp
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.