Literature DB >> 8383541

Chemotherapy for minimally differentiated acute myeloid leukemia (AML-M0). A report on five cases and review of the literature.

N Yokose1, K Ogata, T Ito, K Miyake, E An, K Inokuchi, T Yamada, S Gomi, Y Tanabe, I Ohki.   

Abstract

With the objective of establishing the optimal therapy for minimally differentiated acute myeloid leukemia (AML-M0), we examined the therapeutic results of five AML-M0 cases and reviewed the literature. In a series of 63 patients with newly diagnosed acute leukemia who were admitted to the Main Hospital of Nippon Medical School, five patients fit the criteria for AML-M0: negative myeloperoxidase (MPO) and Sudan black B reaction by light microscopy, negative for B- and T-lineage markers, and positive for myeloid markers. They were treated by means of AdVP [adriamycin, vincristine, and prednisolone (PSL)] therapy and/or BHAC-DMP [behenoylcytosine arabinoside (BHAC), daunorubicin (DNR), 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), and PSL] therapy. The AdVP therapy was unsuccessful in the two patients who received it, while a complete remission (CR) was achieved with the BHAC-DMP therapy in three of four patients. Although one patient treated with BHAC-DMP did not achieve CR, his blasts were apparently sensitive to the therapy. In assessable cases in the literature where leukemic blasts were MPO-negative, myeloid marker-positive and B- and T-lineage marker-negative, CR was achieved in 54.5% and 44.4% with anti-acute myeloid leukemia therapy and anti-acute lymphocytic leukemia therapy, respectively. Five cases in the literature were treated with a chemotherapeutic regimen containing BHAC [or cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C)], DNR, and 6-MP, and all achieved CR. The regimen containing BHAC (or Ara-C), DNR, and 6-MP may be useful as induction chemotherapy for AML-M0.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8383541     DOI: 10.1007/bf01695886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hematol        ISSN: 0939-5555            Impact factor:   3.673


  20 in total

Review 1.  A classification of acute leukaemia for the 1990s.

Authors:  D Catovsky; E Matutes; V Buccheri; V Shetty; J Hanslip; N Yoshida; R Morilla
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.673

2.  Clinical significance of the presence of myeloid associated antigens in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Authors:  A Urbano-Ispizua; E Matutes; N Villamor; J M Ribera; E Feliu; E Montserrat; A Grañena; J L Vives-Corrons; C Rozman
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 6.998

3.  Immunophenotyping of acute myeloid leukaemia: relevance of analysing different lineage-associated markers.

Authors:  F Lo Coco; D Pasqualetti; M Lopez; E Panzini; A Gentile; R Latagliata; B Monarca; G De Rossi
Journal:  Blut       Date:  1989-05

4.  The early stages of absorption of injected horseradish peroxidase in the proximal tubules of mouse kidney: ultrastructural cytochemistry by a new technique.

Authors:  R C Graham; M J Karnovsky
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1966-04       Impact factor: 2.479

5.  Mixed-lineage leukemia revisited: acute lymphocytic leukemia with myeloperoxidase-positive blasts by electron microscopy.

Authors:  H M Kantarjian; C Hirsch-Ginsberg; G Yee; Y Huh; E J Freireich; S Stass
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1990-08-15       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Prognostic value of lymphocyte surface markers in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  E D Ball; R B Davis; J D Griffin; R J Mayer; F R Davey; D C Arthur; D Wurster-Hill; W Noll; M T Elghetany; S L Allen
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1991-05-15       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Proposal for the recognition of minimally differentiated acute myeloid leukaemia (AML-MO)

Authors:  J M Bennett; D Catovsky; M T Daniel; G Flandrin; D A Galton; H R Gralnick; C Sultan
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 6.998

8.  Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase positive acute myeloid leukaemia: an association with immature myeloblastic leukaemia.

Authors:  A Parreira; M S Pombo de Oliveira; E Matutes; L Foroni; R Morilla; D Catovsky
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 6.998

9.  Phenotypic analysis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells which are classified as non-T non-B and negative for common ALL antigen.

Authors:  K Kita; K Nasu; H Kamesaki; S Doi; H Tezuka; E Tatsumi; S Fukuhara; M Nishikori; H Uchino; S Shirakawa
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Clinical importance of myeloid antigen expression in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  R E Sobol; R Mick; I Royston; F R Davey; R R Ellison; R Newman; J Cuttner; J D Griffin; H Collins; D A Nelson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-04-30       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of CD7+CD56+ phenotype and chromosome 5 abnormalities for acute myeloid leukemia M0.

Authors:  Ritsuro Suzuki; Makoto Murata; Masahiro Kami; Shigeki Ohtake; Norio Asou; Yoshihisa Kodera; Masao Tomonaga; Yasufumi Masaki; Shuya Kusumoto; Jin Takeuchi; Shin Matsuda; Hisamaru Hirai; m Seiichi Yorimitsu; Nobuyuki Hamajima; Masao Seto; Masanori Shimoyama; Ryuzo Ohno; Yasuo Morishima; Shigeo Nakamura
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 2.  AML-MO: clinical entity or waste basket for immature blastic leukemias? A description of 14 patients. Dutch Slide Review Committee of Leukemias in Adults.

Authors:  C M Segeren; G C de Jong-Gerrits; M B van 't Veer
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 3.  Contribution of immunophenotypic and genotypic analyses to the diagnosis of acute leukemia.

Authors:  R Stasi; C G Taylor; A Venditti; G Del Poeta; G Aronica; C Bastianelli; M D Simone; F Buccisano; M C Cox; A Bruno
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.673

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.