Literature DB >> 838226

Direct and indirect effects of dextrose and amino acids on gut mass.

M H Spector, G M Levine, J J Deren.   

Abstract

Oral intake of an elemental diet maintains small intestinal mucosal mass compared to the atrophy seen after intravenous infusion of the same diet. The greatest difference in intestinal mass occurs in the proximal bowel and is thought to occur because of rapid absorption in the proximal small bowel. This study was designed to determine the effects of the individual components of the elemental diet and their site of administration within the small bowel on small intestinal mass. Rats were maintained on intravenous alimentation and the proximal gut (by intragastric infusion) or the ileum was continuously infused with equal volumes of 30% dextrose, 5% dextrose, 5% amino acids, saline, or 30% mannitol. After 1 week of combined intravenous alimentation and gut infusion, the rats were killed and parameters of small intestinal epithelial mass were determined sequentially for the entire bowel. Although saline- and mannitol-infused controls did not differ from uninfused intravenously fed rats, proximal infusion of 30% dextrose reproduced the effects of a complete elemental diet. Proximal infusion of amino acids but not 5% dextrose had a limited effect on the duodenum and jejunum. Ileal infusion of 30% dextrose led to local hyperplasia of the site of infusion and in addition produced hyperplasia of the proximal gut. Ileal amino acid infusion, but not 5% dextrose infusion, led to local ileal hyperplasia. We conclude that: (1) intraluminal dextrose and amino acids have direct effects in maintaining gut mass (2) the gut is more responsive to amino acids compared to 5% dextrose, and (3) ileal 30% dextrose infusion leads to remote effects in the proximal gut, perhaps mediated by hormonal or neurovascular factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 838226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  13 in total

Review 1.  Enhancing bowel adaptation in short bowel syndrome.

Authors:  Palle Bekker Jeppesen; Per Brobech Mortensen
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2002-08

2.  Effect of dietary fat on the distribution of mucosal mass and cell proliferation along the small intestine.

Authors:  A P Jenkins; R P Thompson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Separate effects of macronutrient concentration and balance on plastic gut responses in locusts.

Authors:  David Raubenheimer; Kate Bassil
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 2.200

Review 4.  Enteral nutrition and the small intestine.

Authors:  A P Jenkins; R P Thompson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Metabolic response to malnutrition: its relevance to enteral feeding.

Authors:  A H Love
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Trophic response of gut and pancreas after ileojejunal transposition.

Authors:  K U Chu; T Tsuchiya; J Ishizuka; T Uchida; C M Townsend; J C Thompson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Small intestinal and colonic changes induced by a chemically defined diet.

Authors:  C L Morin; V Ling; D Bourassa
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Small intestinal mucosa changes, including epithelial cell proliferative activity, of children receiving total parenteral nutrition (TPN).

Authors:  T M Rossi; P C Lee; C Young; A Tjota
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Effect of dietary carbohydrate on monosaccharide uptake by mouse small intestine in vitro.

Authors:  J M Diamond; W H Karasov; C Cary; D Enders; R Yung
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Relationship between enteral glucose load and adaptive mucosal growth in the small bowel.

Authors:  E Weser; J Babbitt; A Vandeventer
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.