Literature DB >> 8377501

Esophagogastrectomy: reoperation for complications.

Y L Matory1, M Burt.   

Abstract

From 1961 to 1991, a total of 1,452 esophagectomies were performed for esophageal cancer at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Of these patients, 40 (2.7%) developed complications requiring a second operation during the same hospitalization. The majority of the carcinomas were located in the midesophagus or the gastroesophageal junction. The pathologic diagnosis was squamous cell carcinoma in two-thirds of the patients. Few comorbid factors could be identified. Twenty-nine patients (72%) had a standard Ivor-Lewis resection, 5 (12%) had a transhiatal resection, 5 (12%) had a transabdominal approach, and 1 (3%) had a cervical approach only. Complications requiring reoperation were the following: respiratory failure in 13 patients, anastomotic leak in 6, bowel obstruction in 5, major bleeding in 4, wound dehiscence in 4, tracheo-esophageal fistula in 3, feeding tube malposition in 2, empyema in 1, chyle leak in 1, a positive margin in 1. Twelve of these same patients had a persistent or second complication and required a third operation. Among the 40 patients in this study, the mortality was 40%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8377501     DOI: 10.1002/jso.2930540109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  5 in total

1.  Complications requiring reoperation after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: 17 years experience in a single institute.

Authors:  Sung Jin Oh; Won Beom Choi; Jyewon Song; Woo Jin Hyung; Seung Ho Choi; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Anastomotic dehiscence after esophagogastrectomy treated with stent and tissue matrix graft.

Authors:  Johan C Bakken; Ryan Law; Dennis Wigle; Todd H Baron
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Predictive value of blood flow in the gastric tube in anastomotic insufficiency after thoracic esophagectomy.

Authors:  Tatsuya Miyazaki; Hiroyuki Kuwano; Hiroyuki Kato; Minako Yoshikawa; Hitoshi Ojima; Katsuhiko Tsukada
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Endoscopic endoluminal vacuum therapy is superior to other regimens in managing anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: a comparative retrospective study.

Authors:  Bodo Schniewind; Clemens Schafmayer; Gesa Voehrs; Jan Egberts; Witigo von Schoenfels; Tobias Rose; Roland Kurdow; Alexander Arlt; Mark Ellrichmann; Christian Jürgensen; Stefan Schreiber; Thomas Becker; Jochen Hampe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Management of anastomotic leaks following esophagectomy: when to intervene?

Authors:  Joshua L Manghelli; DuyKhanh P Ceppa; Jason W Greenberg; David Blitzer; Adam Hicks; Karen M Rieger; Thomas J Birdas
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.895

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.