Literature DB >> 8377486

The Fluharty Preschool Speech and Language Screening Test: a population-based validation study using sample-independent decision rules.

R A Sturner1, J H Heller, S G Funk, T L Layton.   

Abstract

Two cohorts of 4- and 5-year-old children (N = 700) were screened with the Fluharty Preschool Speech and Language Screening Test. Two stratified samples (n = 51 cohort 1; n = 147 cohort 2), based on speech/language screening results, were administered criterion tests for articulation (AAPS-R or Templin-Darley) and language (TOLD or TALC-R). Clinical validation indices for combined speech or language outcome in the two cohorts were as follows: sensitivity, .43 and .31 respectively; specificity, .82 and .93; predictive value, .43 and .54; overreferral, 14% and 5%; underreferral, 14% in both cohorts, and percent agreement, 72% and 80%. The measure of sensitivities for language outcomes was lower than the above, whereas sensitivities for articulation was higher. These results suggest that the Fluharty is too insensitive to be relied on for screening programs aimed at identifying preschool children with language disorders, although it appears to have promise for the identification of children with articulation impairments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8377486     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3604.738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  5 in total

1.  Concurrent and construct validity of oral language measures with school-age children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  LaVae M Hoffman; Diane Frome Loeb; Jayne Brandel; Ronald B Gillam
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Concurrent Validity of the Fluharty Preschool Speech and Language Screening Test-Second Edition at Age 3: Comparison With Four Diagnostic Measures.

Authors:  Sarita Eisenberg; Kristen Victorino; Sarah Murray
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Comparison of the Diagnostic Evaluation of Language Variation-Screening Test Risk Subtest to Two Other Screeners for Low-Income Prekindergartners Who Speak African American English and Live in the Urban South.

Authors:  Christy Wynn Moland; Janna B Oetting
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  The diagnostic accuracy and construct validity of the structured photographic expressive language test--preschool: second edition.

Authors:  Kathryn J Greenslade; Elena Plante; Rebecca Vance
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 5.  Developmental Language Disorder: Early Predictors, Age for the Diagnosis, and Diagnostic Tools. A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Alessandra Sansavini; Maria Elena Favilla; Maria Teresa Guasti; Andrea Marini; Stefania Millepiedi; Maria Valeria Di Martino; Simona Vecchi; Nadia Battajon; Laura Bertolo; Olga Capirci; Barbara Carretti; Maria Paola Colatei; Cristina Frioni; Luigi Marotta; Sara Massa; Letizia Michelazzo; Chiara Pecini; Silvia Piazzalunga; Manuela Pieretti; Pasquale Rinaldi; Renata Salvadorini; Cristiano Termine; Mariagrazia Zuccarini; Simonetta D'Amico; Anna Giulia De Cagno; Maria Chiara Levorato; Tiziana Rossetto; Maria Luisa Lorusso
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.