Literature DB >> 8377050

Biomechanical testing of a new design for Schanz pedicle screws.

K Willett1, T C Hearn, A V Cuncins.   

Abstract

Standard 5-mm AO Schanz pedicle screws were biomechanically compared with a new design, featuring 6-mm threads with a 5-mm core diameter continuous with the shaft. One each of the two screw designs was surgically inserted into the matching pedicles of 32 cadaveric vertebrae. The pull-out strengths of the screws were then determined by recording the peak force values during extraction under servohydraulic displacement control. The screws were also tested in three-point bending, varying the inner load point with respect to the shaft thread junction, within a clinically anticipated range. The mean pull-out strength for the 6-mm screw was 597 N, which was significantly greater than the mean strength of 405 N for the 5 mm screw (p = 0.002). The 6-mm screw was also stronger in three-point bending, and failed at the point of inner load application, with no evidence of a stress-raising effect at the shaft/thread junction. In contrast, the 5-mm screw withstood lower loads, and failed at the shaft/thread junction, regardless of the point of loading. Pedicle screw breakage and pull-out are the recognized modes of failure of spinal implants, which are dependent on pedicle screw fixation. The results suggest distinct biomechanical advantages for the 6-mm screw, which should be used whenever clinically feasible.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8377050     DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199308000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  7 in total

1.  Biomechanical analysis of differing pedicle screw insertion angles.

Authors:  William Sterba; Do-Gyoon Kim; David P Fyhrie; Yener N Yeni; Rahul Vaidya
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 2.  Internal fixation of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  David L Rothberg; Mark A Lee
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 3.  Historical Note: The Evolution of Cortical Bone Trajectory and Associated Techniques.

Authors:  Sihyong J Kim; Ralph J Mobbs; Pragadesh Natarajan; R Dineth Fonseka; William R Walsh
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-06-11

4.  Stress distribution of different lumbar posterior pedicle screw insertion techniques: a combination study of finite element analysis and biomechanical test.

Authors:  Mingzhi Song; Kebin Sun; Zhonghai Li; Junwei Zong; Xiliang Tian; Kai Ma; Shouyu Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Multiobjective optimization design of spinal pedicle screws using neural networks and genetic algorithm: mathematical models and mechanical validation.

Authors:  Yongyut Amaritsakul; Ching-Kong Chao; Jinn Lin
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 2.238

6.  Ankle Injury Management (AIM): design of a pragmatic multi-centre equivalence randomised controlled trial comparing Close Contact Casting (CCC) to Open surgical Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) in the treatment of unstable ankle fractures in patients over 60 years.

Authors:  Keith Willett; David J Keene; Lesley Morgan; Bridget Gray; Robert Handley; Tim Chesser; Ian Pallister; Elizabeth Tutton; Christopher Knox; Ranjit Lall; Andrew Briggs; Sarah E Lamb
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Biomechanical testing of a unique built-in expandable anterior spinal internal fixation system.

Authors:  Chu-Song Zhou; Yan-Fang Xu; Yu Zhang; Zhong Chen; Hai Lv
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.