Literature DB >> 8376008

Liver contrast media for magnetic resonance imaging. Interrelations between pharmacokinetics and imaging.

G Schuhmann-Giampieri1.   

Abstract

In the development of liver CM for MRI, three mainstream approaches have been undertaken: targeting of water-soluble MRI-CM to the hepatocytes, targeting of particles to the Kupffer cells of the liver, and application of macromolecular CM to tumorous tissue. As with the biliary iodinated CM, the physiological function of the liver has been used to target paramagnetic chelates (T1 agents) to the hepatocytes. Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA are taken up mainly by hepatocytes and excreted into the bile by organic anion transporter (bilirubin transporter), whereas MnDPDP also uses the ability of hepatocytes to excrete metal ions, such as manganese. However, unlike the biliary iodinated CM, besides the specific accumulation in the hepatocytes, the low binding to plasma proteins and the high sensitivity of MRI, combined with the strong increase in relaxivity inside the hepatocellular environment, make the paramagnetic chelates very effective in the detection of liver lesions. Targeting of T2 agents (e.g. SPIO) to the Kupffer cells of the liver also has proved to be very effective in liver lesion detection. However, limited information is available regarding the pharmacokinetics of these particles in man and other problems, such as cardiovascular tolerance and manufacturing, must be overcome before widespread use of particulate CM can be implemented. The third approach is based on the differences in the vessel permeability, the vessel density, and functional lymphatics between normal and tumorous liver tissue when macromolecular CM are administered. This approach, however, is at an early research stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8376008     DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199308000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  17 in total

1.  Optimized high-resolution contrast-enhanced hepatobiliary imaging at 3 tesla: a cross-over comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadoxetic acid.

Authors:  Alex Frydrychowicz; Scott K Nagle; Sharon L D'Souza; Karl K Vigen; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Assessment of liver function in primary biliary cirrhosis using Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MRI.

Authors:  Henrik Nilsson; Lennart Blomqvist; Lena Douglas; Anders Nordell; Eduard Jonas
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Evaluation of regional liver function by gadolinium-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  J Shimizu; K Dono; M Gotoh; Y Hasuike; T Kim; T Murakami; M Sakon; K Umeshita; H Nagano; S Nakamori; N Kato; T Miyazawa; H Nakamura; M Monden
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Nanovehicular intracellular delivery systems.

Authors:  Ales Prokop; Jeffrey M Davidson
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.534

5.  Gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI versus gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced MRI for preoperatively detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: an initial experience.

Authors:  Yulri Park; Seong Hyun Kim; Seung Hoon Kim; Yong Hwan Jeon; Jongmee Lee; Min Ju Kim; Dongil Choi; Won Jae Lee; Heejung Kim; Ji Hyun Koo; Hyo Keun Lim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Detection and characterization of liver lesions using gadoxetic acid as a tissue-specific contrast agent.

Authors:  Peter Reimer; Rolf Vosshenrich
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2010-08-09

Review 7.  Optimization of the future remnant liver: review of the current strategies in Europe.

Authors:  Riccardo Memeo; Maria Conticchio; Emmanuel Deshayes; Silvio Nadalin; Astrid Herrero; Boris Guiu; Fabrizio Panaro
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 7.293

8.  Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for the assessment of liver function and volume in liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  H Nilsson; L Blomqvist; L Douglas; A Nordell; I Janczewska; E Näslund; E Jonas
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Manganese-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Diagnostic and Dispositional Tool after Mild-Moderate Blast Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Olga Rodriguez; Michele L Schaefer; Brock Wester; Yi-Chien Lee; Nathan Boggs; Howard A Conner; Andrew C Merkle; Stanley T Fricke; Chris Albanese; Vassilis E Koliatsos
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 10.  Current Modalities for the Assessment of Future Remnant Liver Function.

Authors:  Fadi Rassam; Pim B Olthof; Roelof J Bennink; Thomas M van Gulik
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.