Literature DB >> 8375559

A comparison of two registration techniques for digital subtraction radiography.

S M Dunn1, P F van der Stelt, A Ponce, K Fenesy, S Shah.   

Abstract

The dental radiograph is a diagnostic tool that is used to view internal structures without any invasive procedures. A difference radiograph, i.e. one showing the changes that occurred over time, is the best tool for diagnosing slow or small changes. The difficulty in creating a meaningful difference radiograph, or its digital image, is that the imaging geometry of the image pair must be identical. This paper addresses the problem of reproducing imaging geometry. A new technique for registering digital images of radiographs based on the correspondence of 3D anatomical structures (such as root apices and the cemento-enamel junction) was compared with a registration method using occlusal stents. In a pilot study of 30 volunteers, difference images were created by three different registration techniques (no registration, mathematical methods and occlusal stents). The standard deviations of the difference images were used to compare the registration techniques. The results show that this new mathematical technique applied to digital images of radiographs can be used to establish correspondence between pairs of clinical images taken at different projection angles and to produce reconstructed images comparable with images taken with occlusal stents.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8375559     DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.22.2.8375559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  3 in total

1.  Assessment of three methods of geometric image reconstruction for digital subtraction radiography.

Authors:  Polyane M Queiroz; Matheus L Oliveira; Jefferson L O Tanaka; Milton G Soares; Francisco Haiter-Neto; Evelise Ono
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Radiographic evaluation of apical root resorption with 2 different types of edgewise appliances. Results of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  E A Reukers; G C Sanderink; A M Kuijpers-Jagtman; M A van't Hof
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Exposure time reduction of secondary radiographs used in digital subtraction radiography in detecting intrabony change.

Authors:  Yukiko Matsuda; Tsuneyasu Terauchi; Kota Murahira; Seema Patil; Vajendra Joshi; Kazuyuki Araki; Akira Taguchi; Tomohiro Okano
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 1.852

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.