A B Carr1, R B Stewart. 1. Section of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Conventional techniques for implant metal framework fabrication produce error of a magnitude that is inconsistent with the passive-fit requirement for osseointegrated implants. To understand the correlation between prosthesis fit and the implant-tissue response, evaluation of the interface tissue reactions to customary levels of fit is required. The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy of torch casting full arch frameworks using a high palladium alloy and a ringless phosphate-bonded investment technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three different variables were considered relative to casting accuracy effect. The first variable, completeness of mold-fill, compared cast specimens where the entire sprue system was filled as part of the casting and cast specimens without the sprue system filled. The second variable, phosphate-bonded investment special liquid concentrations, compared groups of castings produced from 0%, 12%, 25%, and 50% special liquid. The third variable, investment mold shape, compared casting produced from a conventional ringless mold shape with a modified ringless mold shape where the investment in the same horizontal plane as the pattern was equal in thickness at the internal and external surfaces. Horizontal and vertical distances on the wax pattern and resulting framework were measured using a machinists microscope to determine casting error. Combined vertical and horizontal error was used for comparison between groups (one-way analysis of variance). RESULTS: No significant differences existed among the three groups compared (P > 0.05). The mean error comparison between the complete and incomplete mold-fill groups showed no statistical difference, while the incomplete fill group was found to be more porous. The mean error of all groups (0.130 mm) exceeded the recommended level of fit needed to satisfy the passive fit requirement by more than 10-fold. CONCLUSIONS: These results verify clinical observation and suggest that the use of conventional lost wax casting technique to cast one-piece full arch implant frameworks is both imprecise and inaccurate as judged against the passive fit requirement. The consequences of screw-fastening misfitting prostheses to osseointegrated implants is currently under investigation.
PURPOSE: Conventional techniques for implant metal framework fabrication produce error of a magnitude that is inconsistent with the passive-fit requirement for osseointegrated implants. To understand the correlation between prosthesis fit and the implant-tissue response, evaluation of the interface tissue reactions to customary levels of fit is required. The purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy of torch casting full arch frameworks using a high palladium alloy and a ringless phosphate-bonded investment technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three different variables were considered relative to casting accuracy effect. The first variable, completeness of mold-fill, compared cast specimens where the entire sprue system was filled as part of the casting and cast specimens without the sprue system filled. The second variable, phosphate-bonded investment special liquid concentrations, compared groups of castings produced from 0%, 12%, 25%, and 50% special liquid. The third variable, investment mold shape, compared casting produced from a conventional ringless mold shape with a modified ringless mold shape where the investment in the same horizontal plane as the pattern was equal in thickness at the internal and external surfaces. Horizontal and vertical distances on the wax pattern and resulting framework were measured using a machinists microscope to determine casting error. Combined vertical and horizontal error was used for comparison between groups (one-way analysis of variance). RESULTS: No significant differences existed among the three groups compared (P > 0.05). The mean error comparison between the complete and incomplete mold-fill groups showed no statistical difference, while the incomplete fill group was found to be more porous. The mean error of all groups (0.130 mm) exceeded the recommended level of fit needed to satisfy the passive fit requirement by more than 10-fold. CONCLUSIONS: These results verify clinical observation and suggest that the use of conventional lost wax casting technique to cast one-piece full arch implant frameworks is both imprecise and inaccurate as judged against the passive fit requirement. The consequences of screw-fastening misfitting prostheses to osseointegrated implants is currently under investigation.