Literature DB >> 8374382

Dimensions of rationing: who should do what?

R Klein1.   

Abstract

Priority setting is a complex interaction of multiple decisions at various levels in the organisation and constrained by history. There is no self evident set of ethical principles or analytical tools to determine what decisions we should take at various levels, nor is there an obvious or easy way to resolve the clash of claims on resources. To make priority setting more "rational" we should concentrate on the processes and structure of decision making and the relation of macro and micro decisions. The debate should promote reasoned, informed, and open argument, draw on a variety of perspectives, and involve a plurality of interests. The aim must be to build up, over time, the capacity to engage in continuous, collective argument.

Keywords:  Department of Health (Great Britain); Health Care and Public Health; National Health Service

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8374382      PMCID: PMC1678573          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.307.6899.309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  4 in total

1.  Public disagrees with professionals over NHS rationing.

Authors:  Trish Groves
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-03-13

2.  Epidemic herpetic stomatitis in an orphanage nursery.

Authors:  B D HALE; R C RENDTORFF; L C WALKER; A N ROBERTS
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1963-03-30       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Six years experience with herpes simplex virus in a children's home.

Authors:  T C Cesario; J D Poland; H Wulff; T D Chin; H A Wenner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Clinical manifestations of primary herpes simplex virus type 1 infection in a closed community.

Authors:  K Kuzushima; H Kimura; Y Kino; S Kido; N Hanada; M Shibata; T Morishima
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 7.124

  4 in total
  17 in total

Review 1.  Healthcare rationing-are additional criteria needed for assessing evidence based clinical practice guidelines?

Authors:  O F Norheim
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-27

Review 2.  A review of alternative approaches to healthcare resource allocation.

Authors:  S Petrou; J Wolstenholme
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Choosing between competing health priorities. A government payer perspective.

Authors:  J Leese
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Rationing health care: from needs to markets? The politics of destruction: rationing in the UK health care market.

Authors:  A M Pollock
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1995-11

5.  Home ventilation of a child with motor and sensory neuropathy.

Authors:  R H Davies
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-07-20

6.  Lonely at the top and stuck in the middle? The ongoing challenge of using cost-effectiveness information in priority setting : Comment on "Use of cost-effectiveness data in priority setting decisions: experiences from the national guidelines for heart diseases in Sweden".

Authors:  Iestyn Williams; Stirling Bryan
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2015-02-15

7.  Approaches to rationing drugs in hospitals. An Australian perspective.

Authors:  F Bochner; N G Burgess; E D Martin
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Dilemmas in rationing health care services: the case for implicit rationing.

Authors:  D Mechanic
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-06-24

9.  "If a patient is too costly they tend to get rid of you:" the impact of people's perceptions of rationing on the use of primary care.

Authors:  A Rogers; A Chapple; M Sergison
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1999

10.  Priority setting in health care: on the relation between reasonable choices on the micro-level and the macro-level.

Authors:  Kristine Baerøe
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2008-06-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.