Literature DB >> 8374245

Diagnosis of renal transplant failure by real-time and duplex Doppler sonography.

P M Rob1, O Jansen, V Richter, B Erbslöh-Möller, N Marienhoff, G Wiedemann.   

Abstract

A total of 419 real-time and duplex Doppler ultrasound examinations of renal allografts were carried out in 61 patients. Results were related to the clinical diagnoses based on histomorphological, clinical, and laboratory findings. The results of all sonographic examinations in terms of the diagnostic parameters of normal function, acute tubular necrosis, and interstitial and vascular rejection did not yield reliable criteria for distinguishing between the different forms of transplant dysfunction. The maximum difference was calculated for each ultrasound parameter between a time of normal transplant function and at a time of dysfunction. By means of this 'maximum parenchyma-pyelon index difference' it was possible to discriminate between acute tubular necrosis and vascular rejection (P < 0.05). Acute tubular necrosis could be distinguished from interstitial rejection using the maximum longitudinal renal diameter difference and the maximum parenchyma-pyelon index difference (P < 0.05). To discriminate between interstitial and vascular rejection the maximum pulsatility index difference was very useful (P < 0.05). Combined real-time and duplex Doppler sonography is most valuable in the diagnosis of transplant failure when it is performed not only in the case of dysfunction but also when transplant function appears to be normal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8374245     DOI: 10.1007/bf00208475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Investig        ISSN: 0941-0198


  21 in total

1.  Duplex Doppler sonography of renal transplants: lack of sensitivity and specificity in establishing pathologic diagnosis.

Authors:  S M Genkins; F P Sanfilippo; B A Carroll
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Evaluation of renal transplant dysfunction by duplex Doppler sonography: a prospective study and review of the literature.

Authors:  R R Perrella; A J Duerinckx; F N Tessler; G M Danovitch; A Wilkinson; S Gonzalez; A H Cohen; E G Grant
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  [Vascular kidney transplant rejection--is a duplex sonographic diagnosis possible?].

Authors:  R Mallek; G Mostbeck; R Kain; P Pokieser; A Gebauer; C Herold; F Stockenhuber; D Tscholakoff
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1990-03

4.  Renal allografts: prospective analysis of Doppler sonography.

Authors:  K S Allen; D K Jorkasky; P H Arger; M G Velchik; K Grumbach; B G Coleman; M C Mintz; S E Betsch; L J Perloff
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Fine-needle aspiration biopsy in renal transplantation.

Authors:  P J Häyry
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 10.612

6.  Monitoring of renal allografts by duplex ultrasound.

Authors:  K P Grigat; G Leimenstoll; R Engemann; W Niedermayer
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.782

7.  Renal allograft rejection: US evaluation.

Authors:  W Hoddick; R A Filly; U Backman; P W Callen; F Vincenti; H Hricak; B S Mahony; W Amend
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Evaluation of renal transplant rejection by duplex Doppler examination: value of the resistive index.

Authors:  M D Rifkin; L Needleman; M E Pasto; A B Kurtz; P M Foy; E McGlynn; C Canino; O H Baltarowich; R G Pennell; B B Goldberg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Renal allografts in acute rejection: evaluation using duplex sonography.

Authors:  C M Rigsby; K J Taylor; G Weltin; P N Burns; M Bia; R A Princenthal; M Kashgarian; M W Flye
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Duplex Doppler US of renal allografts: causes of elevated resistive index.

Authors:  S Don; K K Kopecky; R S Filo; S B Leapman; J V Thomalla; J A Jones; E C Klatte
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.