OBJECTIVE: This study defined the clearance mechanisms of naturally occurring reflux episodes in normal subjects and patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. SUMMARY BACKGROUND: Previous studies on acid clearance have been performed in the laboratory setting in supine subjects using acid instillation and stationary motility. The mechanisms of clearance have not been studied using ambulatory pH and motility monitoring. METHODS: A new system capable of monitoring simultaneously for 24 hours pharyngeal pressure, esophageal motility, and pH was used to study the clearance of naturally occurring reflux episodes in 10 normal subjects and 18 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Esophageal contraction waves were classified as primary (i.e., initiated by a pharyngeal swallow) and secondary (i.e., unrelated to a pharyngeal swallow). RESULTS: A total of 1288 reflux episodes were analyzed, during which 2781 contraction waves occurred. Clearance (i.e., restoration of pH to > 4) occurred after primary peristalsis in 83% of reflux episodes. An additional 11% were cleared by pharyngeal swallows without an esophageal body response. Secondary waves were rare and when they occurred, only 19% were peristaltic. Secondary peristalsis cleared only 9 of the 1288 reflux episodes. Patients and normal subjects cleared reflux episodes similarly. Baseline swallowing frequency was 0.87/min during the daytime and increased to 2.59/min (p < 0.01) during daytime reflux episodes. Swallowing frequency in response to nighttime reflux episodes was less (1.42/min; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pharyngeal swallowing is the most important mechanism for esophageal acid clearance. Secondary waves are rare, usually disorganized, and unimportant in clearing a reflux episode. During sleep, the mechanisms of clearance are depressed.
OBJECTIVE: This study defined the clearance mechanisms of naturally occurring reflux episodes in normal subjects and patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. SUMMARY BACKGROUND: Previous studies on acid clearance have been performed in the laboratory setting in supine subjects using acid instillation and stationary motility. The mechanisms of clearance have not been studied using ambulatory pH and motility monitoring. METHODS: A new system capable of monitoring simultaneously for 24 hours pharyngeal pressure, esophageal motility, and pH was used to study the clearance of naturally occurring reflux episodes in 10 normal subjects and 18 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Esophageal contraction waves were classified as primary (i.e., initiated by a pharyngeal swallow) and secondary (i.e., unrelated to a pharyngeal swallow). RESULTS: A total of 1288 reflux episodes were analyzed, during which 2781 contraction waves occurred. Clearance (i.e., restoration of pH to > 4) occurred after primary peristalsis in 83% of reflux episodes. An additional 11% were cleared by pharyngeal swallows without an esophageal body response. Secondary waves were rare and when they occurred, only 19% were peristaltic. Secondary peristalsis cleared only 9 of the 1288 reflux episodes. Patients and normal subjects cleared reflux episodes similarly. Baseline swallowing frequency was 0.87/min during the daytime and increased to 2.59/min (p < 0.01) during daytime reflux episodes. Swallowing frequency in response to nighttime reflux episodes was less (1.42/min; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pharyngeal swallowing is the most important mechanism for esophageal acid clearance. Secondary waves are rare, usually disorganized, and unimportant in clearing a reflux episode. During sleep, the mechanisms of clearance are depressed.
Authors: R M Bremner; M Costantini; S F Hoeft; A Yasui; P F Crookes; H Shibberu; J H Peters; K Nicholas; T R DeMeester Journal: Biomed Instrum Technol Date: 1993 Jan-Feb
Authors: J R Jamieson; H J Stein; T R DeMeester; L Bonavina; W Schwizer; R A Hinder; M Albertucci Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 1992-09 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Ivan M Lang; Bidyut K Medda; Sudarshan R Jadcherla; Reza Shaker Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 4.052