Literature DB >> 8372935

Ratios as a size adjustment in morphometrics.

G H Albrecht1, B R Gelvin, S E Hartman.   

Abstract

Simple ratios in which a measurement variable is divided by a size variable are commonly used but known to be inadequate for eliminating size correlations from morphometric data. Deficiencies in the simple ratio can be alleviated by incorporating regression coefficients describing the bivariate relationship between the measurement and size variables. Recommendations have included: 1) subtracting the regression intercept to force the bivariate relationship through the origin (intercept-adjusted ratios); 2) exponentiating either the measurement or the size variable using an allometry coefficient to achieve linearity (allometrically adjusted ratios); or 3) both subtracting the intercept and exponentiating (fully adjusted ratios). These three strategies for deriving size-adjusted ratios imply different data models for describing the bivariate relationship between the measurement and size variables (i.e., the linear, simple allometric, and full allometric models, respectively). Algebraic rearrangement of the equation associated with each data model leads to a correctly formulated adjusted ratio whose expected value is constant (i.e., size correlation is eliminated). Alternatively, simple algebra can be used to derive an expected value function for assessing whether any proposed ratio formula is effective in eliminating size correlations. Some published ratio adjustments were incorrectly formulated as indicated by expected values that remain a function of size after ratio transformation. Regression coefficients incorporated into adjusted ratios must be estimated using least-squares regression of the measurement variable on the size variable. Use of parameters estimated by any other regression technique (e.g., major axis or reduced major axis) results in residual correlations between size and the adjusted measurement variable. Correctly formulated adjusted ratios, whose parameters are estimated by least-squares methods, do control for size correlations. The size-adjusted results are similar to those based on analysis of least-squares residuals from the regression of the measurement on the size variable. However, adjusted ratios introduce size-related changes in distributional characteristics (variances) that differentially alter relationships among animals in different size classes.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8372935     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330910404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  17 in total

1.  Size correction in biology: how reliable are approaches based on (common) principal component analysis?

Authors:  Daniel Berner
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Age-related changes in cortical porosity of the midshaft of the human femur.

Authors:  S A Feik; C D Thomas; J G Clement
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Fourier analysis of human soft tissue facial shape: sex differences in normal adults.

Authors:  V F Ferrario; C Sforza; J H Schmitz; A Miani; G Taroni
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  The exchangeability of shape.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Al Dujardin; Dramane Kaba; Amy B Henry
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-10-22

5.  Configuration of the setal fields of Rhoptropus (Gekkota: Gekkonidae): functional, evolutionary, ecological and phylogenetic implications of observed pattern.

Authors:  Megan K Johnson; Anthony P Russell
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  The scaling of human basal and resting metabolic rates.

Authors:  Heather M Bowes; Catriona A Burdon; Nigel A S Taylor
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Body Size, Metabolic Factors, and Risk of Endometrial Cancer in Black Women.

Authors:  Todd R Sponholtz; Julie R Palmer; Lynn Rosenberg; Elizabeth E Hatch; Lucile L Adams-Campbell; Lauren A Wise
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  A comprehensive allometric analysis of 2nd digit length to 4th digit length in humans.

Authors:  Lorenzo Lolli; Alan M Batterham; Lukáš Kratochvíl; Jaroslav Flegr; Kathryn L Weston; Greg Atkinson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Obese individuals do not underreport dietary intake to a greater extent than nonobese individuals when data are allometrically-scaled.

Authors:  Sally P Waterworth; Catherine J Kerr; Christopher J McManus; Rianne Costello; Gavin R H Sandercock
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.947

10.  Intraspecific variation in the Cambrian: new observations on the morphology of the Chengjiang euarthropod Sinoburius lunaris.

Authors:  Michel Schmidt; Yu Liu; Xianguang Hou; Joachim T Haug; Carolin Haug; Huijan Mai; Roland R Melzer
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.