Literature DB >> 8372849

A randomized trial of prenatal ultrasonographic screening: impact on maternal management and outcome. RADIUS (Routine Antenatal Diagnostic Imaging with Ultrasound) Study Group.

M L LeFevre1, R P Bain, B G Ewigman, F D Frigoletto, J P Crane, D McNellis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This randomized clinical trial of 15,530 women was designed to test the hypothesis that screening ultrasonography in low-risk pregnancies would improve perinatal outcome. A secondary hypothesis addressed in this article was that screening ultrasonography would have a favorable impact on maternal management or outcome. STUDY
DESIGN: Pregnant women without a specific indication for ultrasonographic examination in early pregnancy were randomly assigned to have either two screening sonograms or conventional obstetric care. Pregnancy interventions and maternal outcomes were compared in the two groups.
RESULTS: No significant differences were found in maternal outcomes. Use of ultrasonography was markedly higher in the screened group. The rates of induced abortion, amniocentesis, tests of fetal well-being, external version, induction, and cesarean section and the distribution of total hospital days were similar in the two groups. Use of tocolytics and the rate of postdate pregnancy were both slightly lower in the screened group.
CONCLUSION: Screening ultrasonography resulted in no clinically significant benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8372849     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90605-i

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  12 in total

1.  Medicalization and obstetric care: an analysis of developments in Dutch midwifery.

Authors:  Anke D J Smeenk; Henk A M J ten Have
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2003

Review 2.  Three- and 4-dimensional ultrasound in obstetric practice: does it help?

Authors:  Luís F Gonçalves; Wesley Lee; Jimmy Espinoza; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 3.  What is the evidence based role of US in evaluating the fetus?

Authors:  Dorothy I Bulas
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-04

Review 4.  Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy.

Authors:  Melissa Whitworth; Leanne Bricker; James P Neilson; Therese Dowswell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-04-14

Review 5.  Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks' gestation).

Authors:  Leanne Bricker; Nancy Medley; Jeremy J Pratt
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-29

Review 6.  Routine ultrasound for fetal assessment before 24 weeks' gestation.

Authors:  Andrea Kaelin Agten; Jun Xia; Juliette A Servante; Jim G Thornton; Nia W Jones
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-08-26

Review 7.  The impact of fetal echocardiography.

Authors:  J P Kovalchin; N H Silverman
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 8.  Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy.

Authors:  Melissa Whitworth; Leanne Bricker; Clare Mullan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-14

9.  Utilisation of obstetric sonography at a peri-urban health centre in Uganda.

Authors:  Mubuuke Aloysius Gonzaga; Elsie Kiguli-Malwadde; Francis Businge; Rosemary Kusaba Byanyima
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2010-12-28

Review 10.  Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks' gestation).

Authors:  Leanne Bricker; James P Neilson; Therese Dowswell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.