Literature DB >> 8371243

A 25-year prospective study of modified radical mastectomy (Patey) in 193 patients.

M D Staunton1, D M Melville, A Monterrosa, J M Thomas.   

Abstract

The results of a prospective study over 20 years of 193 patients with breast carcinoma treated by Patey mastectomy are presented together with details of the operative technique employed. One hundred and twenty-eight cases (66%) were stage 1 (T1/T2 N0), 46 (24%) were stage 2 (T1/T2 N1), 18 (9%) were stage 3 (T3 N0/N1), and one was stage 4 (M1). The probability of survival together with 95% confidence intervals for stage 1 (T1/T2 N0) at 10 years was 79% (71-88); and at 15 years 74% (61-87). For stage 2 (T1/T2 N1), the probability of survival at 10 years was 64% (48-79), and at 15 years 60% (44-76). For stage 3 (T3 N0/N1), the probability of survival at 10 years was 70% (45-95) and nobody survived at 15 years. These differences between the clinical stages lacked significance [Log-rank test: chi 2 = 3.44 df = 2 P = 0.18]. There were nine patients (5%) who developed local recurrence without systemic metastases. There was no postoperative mortality, and morbidity was low. Axillary node metastases depressed survival with probability of survival at 10 years 43% (29-57) in contrast to those without it 90% (84-96) [log-rank test: chi 2 = 39.42 df = 1 P < 0.0001]. Patey mastectomy should be considered for patients with T1 or T2 tumours who choose mastectomy rather than breast conservation. It is an effective local treatment which is of particular relevance in countries where radiotherapy is not available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8371243      PMCID: PMC1293004          DOI: 10.1177/014107689308600704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   18.000


  16 in total

1.  Carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  R S Handley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Does radical mastectomy still have a place in the treatment of primary operable breast cancer?

Authors:  W A Maddox; J T Carpenter; H T Laws; S J Soong; G Cloud; C M Balch; M M Urist
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1987-11

3.  The effect of surgical technique on local recurrence rates following mastectomy.

Authors:  E A Benson; J Thorogood
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.424

4.  Modified radical mastectomy.

Authors:  J L Madden
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1965-12

5.  Manchester regional breast study--5 and 10 year results.

Authors:  J P Lythgoe; M K Palmer
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Comparison of Halsted mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in early breast cancer: long-term results.

Authors:  U Veronesi; A Banfi; M Del Vecchio; R Saccozzi; C Clemente; M Greco; A Luini; E Marubini; G Muscolino; F Rilke
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1986-09

7.  Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  B Fisher; C Redmond; R Poisson; R Margolese; N Wolmark; L Wickerham; E Fisher; M Deutsch; R Caplan; Y Pilch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-03-30       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Techniques of lumpectomy and axillary dissection.

Authors:  M D Stone; B Cady
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  A review of 146 cases of carcinoma of the breast operated on between 1930 and 1943.

Authors:  D H Patey
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1967-06       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The prognosis of carcinoma of the breast in relation to the type of operation performed.

Authors:  D H PATEY; W H DYSON
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1948-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.