Literature DB >> 8371179

Effects of intraoral appliance and biofeedback/stress management alone and in combination in treating pain and depression in patients with temporomandibular disorders.

D C Turk1, H S Zaki, T E Rudy.   

Abstract

To assess the differential efficacy of two commonly used treatments for temporomandibular disorders (TMD), intraoral appliances (IAs) and biofeedback (BF), separately and in combination, two studies were conducted. The first study directly compared IA treatment, a combination of biofeedback and stress management (BF/SM), and a waiting list control group in a sample of 80 TMD patients. Both treatments were determined to be equally credible to patients, ruling out this potential threat to the validity of the results obtained. The results demonstrated that the IA treatment was more effective than the BF/SM treatment in reducing pain after treatment, but at a 6-month follow-up the IA group significantly relapsed, especially in depression, whereas the BF/SM maintained improvements on both pain and depression and continued to improve. The second study examined the combination of IA and BF/SM in a sample of 30 TMD patients. The results of this study demonstrated that the combined treatment approach was more effective than either of the single treatments alone, particularly in pain reduction, at the 6-month follow-up. These results support the importance of using both dental and psychologic treatments to successfully treat TMD patients if treatment gains are to be maintained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8371179     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90012-d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  24 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy of stabilization splints for the management of patients with masticatory muscle pain: a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  J C Türp; F Komine; A Hugger
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2004-06-04       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  A survey on German dentists regarding the management of craniomandibular disorders.

Authors:  Michelle Alicia Ommerborn; Carolin Kollmann; Jörg Handschel; Rita Antonia Depprich; Hermann Lang; Wolfgang Hans-Michael Raab
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  The role of psychosocial factors in temporomandibular disorders.

Authors:  G B Rollman; J M Gillespie
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  2000

4.  Summary of the scientific literature for pain and anxiety control in dentistry.

Authors:  L C Hassett
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1994

5.  Behavioural and physiological outcomes of biofeedback therapy on dental anxiety of children undergoing restorations: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  P Dedeepya; S Nuvvula; R Kamatham; S V S G Nirmala
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2013-08-02

Review 6.  Nonpharmacologic approaches to the management of myofascial temporomandibular disorders.

Authors:  J J Sherman; D C Turk
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2001-10

7.  Determinants of pain treatment response and nonresponse: identification of TMD patient subgroups.

Authors:  Mark D Litt; Felipe B Porto
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 5.820

8.  Long-term outcomes of shamanic treatment for temporomandibular joint disorders.

Authors:  Nancy H Vuckovic; Louise A Williams; Jennifer Schneider; Michelle Ramirez; Christina M Gullion
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2012

Review 9.  [Chronic temporomandibular disorders].

Authors:  J C Türp; H J Schindler
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.107

10.  The Relaxation Response Resiliency Enhancement Program in the Management of Chronic Refractory Temporomandibular Joint Disorder: Results from a Pilot Study.

Authors:  Ana-Maria Vranceanu; Jeffery R Shaefer; Ashkan Fahandej Saadi; Ellen Slawsby; Jaya Sarin; Matthew Scult; Herbert Benson; John W Denninger
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Pain       Date:  2013-08-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.