Literature DB >> 8370748

Timely culture for mycobacteria which utilizes a microcolony method.

D F Welch1, A P Guruswamy, S J Sides, C H Shaw, M J Gilchrist.   

Abstract

For the isolation of mycobacteria from clinical specimens, we evaluated a method that used a thinly poured Middlebrook 7H11 agar plate (10 by 90 mm) that was examined microscopically. Inoculated plates were sealed, incubated, and examined at regular intervals for the appearance of microcolonies. Plates were examined microscopically, while still sealed, by focusing on the agar surface through the bottom of the plate and the agar. Plates were scanned at low power (x40 total magnification), and colony morphology was confirmed at intermediate power (x100 to x180 magnification). This method was compared with a traditional method that used macroscopic examination of standard mycobacterial media. By using all specimens submitted for mycobacterial culture over the duration of the study, the method was evaluated until 270 isolates of mycobacteria (Mycobacterium tuberculosis, n = 103; M. avium-M. intracellulare, n = 115; miscellaneous, n = 52) were detected. While the conventional method required an average of 23 days to the time of first detection of mycobacteria, the experimental method required an average of only 11 days. When limited to acid-fast stain-positive specimens that were culture positive for M. tuberculosis, the average interval to positivity was 7 days for the microcolony method compared with 17 days for the conventional method. With the experimental method, the microscopic colonial morphology allowed for the presumptive identification of M. tuberculosis colonies, which were distinguished by cording, and M. avium-M. intracellulare colonies, which were smooth and entire. Presumptive identification was complete for 83.5% of the M. tuberculosis isolates within 10 days and for 85% of the M. avium-M. intracellulare isolates within 11 days after inoculation. If the microcolony method was combined with a conventional tube medium, the composite would optimize for speed of recovery while providing the full sensitivity of the conventional method. In addition to reducing the interval to positivity, the microcolony method allows for the easy detection of mixed mycobacterial infections and yields a presumptive identification that facilitates the selection of a confirmatory gene probe test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8370748      PMCID: PMC265718          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.31.8.2178-2184.1993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  6 in total

Review 1.  The rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis: a selective review.

Authors:  T M Daniel
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  1990-09

2.  Identification of mycobacterial pathogens utilizing colony characteristics.

Authors:  E H Runyon
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1970-10       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Differential colonial characteristics of mycobacteria on Middlebrook and Cohn 7H10 agar-base medium.

Authors:  A L Vestal; G P Kubica
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1966-08

4.  Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum samples using a polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  K D Eisenach; M D Sifford; M D Cave; J H Bates; J T Crawford
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1991-11

5.  Evaluation of polymerase chain reaction, tuberculostearic acid analysis, and direct microscopy for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum.

Authors:  B Savić; U Sjöbring; S Alugupalli; L Larsson; H Miörner
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Role of solid media when used in conjunction with the BACTEC system for mycobacterial isolation and identification.

Authors:  C E Stager; J P Libonati; S H Siddiqi; J R Davis; N M Hooper; J F Baker; M E Carter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.948

  6 in total
  9 in total

1.  Number of days required for recovery of mycobacteria from blood and other samples.

Authors:  J Esteban; A Molleja; R Fernández-Roblas; F Soriano
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Rapid detection of tuberculous and non-tuberculous mycobacteria by microscopic observation of growth on Middlebrook 7H11 agar.

Authors:  P Idigoras; E Pérez-Trallero; M Alcorta; C Gutiérrez; I Muñoz-Baroja
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Assessment of mycobacteremia detection as a complementary method for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in HIV-infected patients.

Authors:  J Hernández; A Jaramillo; G I Mejía; P Barón; V Gomez; M A Restrepo; J Robledo
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Hospital control and multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis in female patients, Lima, Peru.

Authors:  F F Willingham; T L Schmitz; M Contreras; S E Kalangi; A M Vivar; L Caviedes; E Schiantarelli; P M Neumann; C Bern; R H Gilman
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 5.  Practice Guidelines for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: Mycobacteria.

Authors:  Betty A Forbes; Geraldine S Hall; Melissa B Miller; Susan M Novak; Marie-Claire Rowlinson; Max Salfinger; Akos Somoskövi; David M Warshauer; Michael L Wilson
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 6.  Tuberculosis in the developing world: recent advances in diagnosis with special consideration of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis.

Authors:  Louis Grandjean; David A J Moore
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.915

7.  Rapid diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.

Authors:  José Mauricio Hernández Sarmiento; Natalia Builes Restrepo; Gloria Isabel Mejía; Elsa Zapata; Mary Alejandra Restrepo; Jaime Robledo
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2014-06-17

Review 8.  Diagnostic Molecular Microbiology: A 2018 Snapshot.

Authors:  Marilynn Ransom Fairfax; Martin H Bluth; Hossein Salimnia
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.935

Review 9.  Diagnostic molecular microbiology: a 2013 snapshot.

Authors:  Marilynn Ransom Fairfax; Hossein Salimnia
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.935

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.