Literature DB >> 8370018

Thrombolytic therapy for deep venous thrombosis: a clinical review.

A J Comerota1, S C Aldridge.   

Abstract

Although anticoagulation is the treatment most commonly chosen for patients suffering from deep venous thrombosis (DVT), thrombolytic therapy offers the promise of dissolving the thrombus within the deep venous system, restoring patency and preserving valve function. If this is achieved, the incidence and severity of post-thrombotic syndrome can be reduced. Data from 13 studies comparing anticoagulant therapy with thrombolytic therapy for DVT in 591 patients have shown that, among those treated with heparin, 4% had significant or complete lysis, 14% had partial lysis and 82% failed to improve or worsened. Of those receiving lytic therapy, 45% had significant or complete lysis, 18% had partial lysis and 37% failed to improve or worsened. Long-term follow-up of randomized patients has shown that those with successful lysis had a lower incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome and improved long-term venous function. The failure rate of systemic lytic therapy among patients suffering iliofemoral venous thrombosis is high; therefore, catheter-directed thrombolysis has been adopted with increasing success. Thrombolytic therapy, delivered systemically using catheter-directed techniques, should be considered as an important alternative in the treatment of patients with DVT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8370018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  16 in total

Review 1.  [Emergencies in phlebology].

Authors:  F Pannier; E Rabe
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  Invasive management of deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  N I Jowett; C C Robinson; W M Clow
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Venous thromboembolic disease.

Authors:  Michael B Streiff; Paula L Bockenstedt; Spero R Cataland; Carolyn Chesney; Charles Eby; John Fanikos; Patrick F Fogarty; Shuwei Gao; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Hani Hassoun; Paul Hendrie; Bjorn Holmstrom; Kimberly A Jones; Nicole Kuderer; Jason T Lee; Michael M Millenson; Anne T Neff; Thomas L Ortel; Judy L Smith; Gary C Yee; Anaadriana Zakarija
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 11.908

4.  EkoSonic Thrombolysis as a Therapeutic Adjunct in Venous Occlusive Disease.

Authors:  D S Zaghlool; R W Franz; J Jenkins
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2016-04-03

5.  Thrombosis of the left brachiocephalic vein after subtotal esophagectomy with reconstruction using a retrosternally shifted gastric tube: Report of a case.

Authors:  Masato Maeda; Toshihiko Goto; Eiji Yamamura; Motoko Harigai; Fujimasa Tada; Masayuki Nakau; Takenao Idezawa; Tadashi Miyashita
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis: conventional therapy versus lysis and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting.

Authors:  A F AbuRahma; S E Perkins; J T Wulu; H K Ng
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Successful Thrombolysis of Occluded Inferior Vena Cava Filter with IVC Syndrome.

Authors:  Bc Srinivas; Ajit Pal Singh
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Thorac Res       Date:  2012-10-30

8.  Percutaneous options for acute deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Suresh Vedantham; Clay Padginton
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.513

9.  Endovascular treatment of iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis in pregnancy using US-guided percutaneous aspiration thrombectomy.

Authors:  Murat Gedikoglu; Levent Oguzkurt
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

10.  Predictors of Interventional Treatment Use for Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Lara Yoon; Grace Clarke Hillyer; Ling Chen; Jim C Hu; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.