Prospective randomized comparison of teres cardiopexy and Nissen fundoplication in the surgical therapy of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Teres cardiopexy was compared with Nissen fundoplication in a prospective randomized study of surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease refractory to medical treatment. Follow-up at 3 months of ten patients undergoing each procedure showed good clinical results and improvement of the mean symptom score in both groups, for cardiopexy from 7.8 to 1.1 (P < 0.01) and for fundoplication from 5.7 to 0.2 (P < 0.01). After 1 year, six of the ten patients undergoing cardiopexy required a second antireflux procedure because of recurrent disease, whereas one reoperation was performed after fundoplication. The mean symptom score after 1 year was higher in patients submitted to cardiopexy than in those receiving fundoplication (3.9 versus 0.3, P < 0.01). The mean endoscopic oesophagitis score after 1 year was no different from preoperative values after cardiopexy (1.9 versus 1.9) but was significantly lower after fundoplication (1.5 versus 0.3, P = 0.01). Ambulatory 24-h pH monitoring showed a significantly higher proportion of total time at pH < 4 after cardiopexy than fundoplication (24.0 versus 3.8 per cent, P < 0.05). Cardiopexy is significantly less effective than fundoplication for the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease assessed at 1-year follow-up. This study does not support the use of cardiopexy either in conventional or laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

RCT Entities:   Population Interventions Outcomes