Literature DB >> 836979

Mercury levels in freshwater fish of the state of South Carolina.

A K Koli, W R Williams, E B McClary, E L Wright, T M Burrell.   

Abstract

Samples of fish from freshwater sources of rivers, lakes and ponds all over the state of South Carolina were collected during the Summer of 1974 and 1975. The fish collected were Bass, Bluegill, Redbreast, Catfish, Shad, Carp, Crappie, Mudfish and Pike. Samples were analyzed using the flameless atomic absorption procedure outlined by Hatch and Ott, and Uthe et al as modified for use with Perkin-Elmer, Coleman MAS-50 mercury analyzer. Triplicate samples of fish tissue were analyzed by wet digestion method. The mean mercury levels in ppb were determined for baseline mercury levels. A significant finding of this report is that those species for which fish of widely differing weights were analyzed, larger fish had higher mercury levels. Mercury levels exceeding the U.S. Food and Drug Administration guideline of 500 ppb for fish tissues have been found in the Mudfish from Edisto River and Pike fish from Lake Murray. Higher levels of mercury occurred in the highly vascularized blood tissues of liver and kidney than in muscle. Carnivorous and bottom-feeding fishes are the most reliable indicators of mercury pollution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 836979     DOI: 10.1007/BF01685266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol        ISSN: 0007-4861            Impact factor:   2.151


  4 in total

1.  [STUDIES ON THE PHAGES OF ACID-FAST BACTERIA].

Authors:  K TAKEYA
Journal:  Nihon Saikingaku Zasshi       Date:  1964-09

2.  Methylmercury poisoning in Iraq.

Authors:  F Bakir; S F Damluji; L Amin-Zaki; M Murtadha; A Khalidi; N Y al-Rawi; S Tikriti; H I Dahahir; T W Clarkson; J C Smith; R A Doherty
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-07-20       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Synthesis of methyl-mercury compounds by extracts of a methanogenic bacterium.

Authors:  J M Wood; F S Kennedy; C G Rosen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1968-10-12       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Biological methylation of mercury in aquatic organisms.

Authors:  S Jensen; A Jernelöv
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1969-08-16       Impact factor: 49.962

  4 in total
  8 in total

1.  Importance of eating habits and sample size in the estimation of environmental mercury contamination using biological indicators.

Authors:  F Rincón-León; G Zurera-Cosano; R Moreno-Rojas; M Amaro-López
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Lead and cadmium concentrations in red crayfish (Procambarus clarkii, G.) in the Guadalquivir River marshes (Spain).

Authors:  F Rincon-Leon; G Zurera-Cosano; R Pozo-Lora
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Size and mercury concentration relationship as contamination index.

Authors:  F Rincón; G Zurera; R Pozo-Lora
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.151

4.  Heavy metal concentrations in the Holston River Basin (Tennessee).

Authors:  G J Young; R D Blevins
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Assessment of elemental contaminants in water and fish samples from Aba river.

Authors:  I J Alinnor
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Heavy metal contamination in two commercial fish species of a trans-Himalayan freshwater ecosystem.

Authors:  Mohammad Aneesul Mehmood; Humaira Qadri; Rouf Ahmad Bhat; Asmat Rashid; Sartaj Ahmad Ganie; Gowhar Hamid Dar
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-01-26       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Trace metals in some fish species of South Carolina.

Authors:  A K Koli; S S Sandhu; W T Canty; K L Felix; R J Reed; R Whitmore
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.151

Review 8.  Healthy environments for healthy people: bioremediation today and tomorrow.

Authors:  C Bonaventura; F M Johnson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 9.031

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.