Literature DB >> 8369122

A comparison of current expressions of nasal patency.

K Naito1, S Iwata, E Ohoka, Y Kondo, M Takeuchi.   

Abstract

Rhinomanometry is well established as a useful clinical method for objective assessment of nasal patency, although several expressions of nasal patency have been reported and universal standardization has not been achieved. In this communication, nasal resistances were calculated from the equation R = delta P/V (R; resistance; delta P; transnasal differential pressure; V; nasal airflow) at delta P 100 Pa and at peak flow. Time-averaged nasal resistances and integrated nasal patencies were measured in 350 adult patients by Rhinorheograph MPR-1100 and processed by a NI-101 computer program. The values from the equation R = delta P/V at delta P 100 Pa were slightly lower than those from the same equation at peak flow or those from the time-averaging method. Correlations between the values of nasal resistance at peak flow and the time averaging method were very close to the line of identity. No significant correlations were demonstrated between integrated nasal patency and the values from the other three expressions. The differences of the results from these expression are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8369122     DOI: 10.1007/bf00171535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  14 in total

1.  MEASUREMENT OF NASAL AIRWAY RESISTANCE.

Authors:  W R SOLOMON; J A MCLEAN; C COOKINGHAM; G AHRONHEIM; G R DEMUTH
Journal:  J Allergy       Date:  1965 Jan-Feb

2.  The work of breathing through the nose.

Authors:  J BUTLER
Journal:  Clin Sci       Date:  1960-02       Impact factor: 6.124

3.  A fundamental study of rhinomanometry and its clinical application to objective evaluation.

Authors:  K Naito; S Iwata; M Kondo; E Ohoka; P Cole
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.863

4.  Computer averaged nasal resistance.

Authors:  K Naito; P Cole; R Chaban; D Humphrey
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.681

5.  Resistance to respiratory airflow of the nasal passages: comparisons between different common methods of calculation.

Authors:  P Cole; T E Havas
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.681

6.  A clinical method for determination of nasal airway resistance.

Authors:  S Ingelstedt; B Jonson; H Rundcrantz
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  Comparison of different coefficients and units in rhinomanometry.

Authors:  J Eichler; H Lenz
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.681

8.  [Changes in nasal resistance induced by nasal provocation in nasal allergy].

Authors:  K Naito; Y Senoh; H Toda; K Koyama; S Iwata
Journal:  Arerugi       Date:  1985-06

9.  Rhinometry: measurement of nasal patency.

Authors:  J T Connell
Journal:  Ann Allergy       Date:  1982-10

10.  Human respiratory airflow through an artificial nasal model: pressure/flow relationship.

Authors:  K Naito; S Iwata; M Kondo; E Ohoka
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.863

View more
  1 in total

1.  Nasal obstruction causes a decrease in lip-closing force.

Authors:  Kishio Sabashi; Kaei Washino; Issei Saitoh; Youichi Yamasaki; Atsushi Kawabata; Yousuke Mukai; Noriyuki Kitai
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 2.079

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.