Literature DB >> 8368304

Characterization of osteogenic response to mechanical stimulation in cancellous bone of rat caudal vertebrae.

J W Chow1, C J Jagger, T J Chambers.   

Abstract

We have recently developed an experimental model in which pins, inserted into the 7th and 9th caudal vertebrae of 13-wk-old rats, are used to load the 8th caudal vertebra in compression. We have now applied this model to assess the responsiveness of rat cancellous bone to mechanical stimulation. We found that daily exposure to loads that induce strains similar to those observed in bone during relatively gentle physical activity, for 30 cycles/day, increased the rate of lamellar bone formation on cancellous surfaces by up to 140-fold. Bone formation rate showed a highly significant (P < 0.0001) correlation with the number of days for which the bones were loaded and with the size of the load. A single loading episode of 300 cycles, representing a 10-min period of loading, increased bone formation to 24 times that in nonloaded controls. Indexes of bone resorption were essentially the inverse of the bone formation parameters. These experiments show that rat cancellous bone is exquisitely sensitive to mechanical stimulation and suggest that the mechanical environment is a major determinant of the physiological behavior of mammalian cancellous bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8368304     DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.1993.265.2.E340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  25 in total

1.  Cancellous bone adaptation to tibial compression is not sex dependent in growing mice.

Authors:  Maureen E Lynch; Russell P Main; Qian Xu; Daniel J Walsh; Mitchell B Schaffler; Timothy M Wright; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2010-06-24

2.  High-impact exercise frequency per week or day for osteogenic response in rats.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Umemura; Seigo Nagasawa; Akiko Honda; Rabindarjeet Singh
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  On animal models for studying bone adaptation.

Authors:  C H Turner; M R Forwood
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Estrogen suppresses activation but enhances formation phase of osteogenic response to mechanical stimulation in rat bone.

Authors:  C J Jagger; J W Chow; T J Chambers
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Electrically induced muscle contractions influence bone density decline after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Richard K Shields; Shauna Dudley-Javoroski; Laura A Frey Law
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Muscle and bone plasticity after spinal cord injury: review of adaptations to disuse and to electrical muscle stimulation.

Authors:  Shauna Dudley-Javoroski; Richard K Shields
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

7.  Pause insertions during cyclic in vivo loading affect bone healing.

Authors:  Michael J Gardner; Benjamin F Ricciardi; Timothy M Wright; Mathias P Bostrom; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Periostin-like-factor and Periostin in an animal model of work-related musculoskeletal disorder.

Authors:  Shobha Rani; Mary F Barbe; Ann E Barr; Judith Litvin
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Effects of a 1-year randomized controlled trial of resistance training on lower limb bone and muscle structure and function in older men.

Authors:  J Whiteford; T R Ackland; S S Dhaliwal; A P James; J J Woodhouse; R Price; R L Prince; D A Kerr
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  The mouse fibula as a suitable bone for the study of functional adaptation to mechanical loading.

Authors:  Alaa Moustafa; Toshihiro Sugiyama; Leanne K Saxon; Gul Zaman; Andrew Sunters; Victoria J Armstrong; Behzad Javaheri; Lance E Lanyon; Joanna S Price
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.