Literature DB >> 836790

The structure of chromatin: interaction of ethidium bromide with native and denatured chromatin.

J Paoletti, B B Magee, P T Magee.   

Abstract

The binding of ethidium bromide, as monitored by fluorescence enhancement, to chromatin prepared by nuclease digestion has been compared with the binding of the dye to sheared chromatin. The nuclease preparation (native chromatin) is characterized by a high affinity region of the Scatchard plot (r = 0-0.025, K1 = 1 X 10(6) M-1), a transition (r = 0.025-0.05), and a low affinity region (r = 0.05-0.12, K2 = 3 X 10(5) M-1). The final amount of ethidium bromide bound per base is 0.12 as compared with 0.20 for free DNA. Sheared chromatin has the two regions of high and low affinity (K1 = 2 X 10(6) M-1, K2 = 5 X 10(5) M-1) as originally shown by Angerer and Moudrianakis (1972), but the transition is much reduced or absent. Binding of the dye to native chromatin is independent of salt at concentrations ranging from 0.2 mM EDTA to 10 mM Tris-Cl, 10 mM NaCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, while sheared chromatin and DNA both bind ethidium bromide electrostatically as well as by intercalation at the low salt concentration, leading to extensive energy transfer. Thus the phosphate groups in native chromatin are unavailable to external cations even at very low salt. Polarization of fluorescence of ethidium bromide intercalated into native chromatin at low r is very high, indicating a highly rigid structure. As r approaches 0.02, there is a very rapid depolarization; at r = 0.03, the polarization is no greater than that of the dye intercalated into DNA. Depolarization is not due to energy transfer. The Scatchard plot derived for the bulk preparation of native chromatin is very similar to the one derived for the monomer nu body. These results indicate that the DNA in native chromatin is in a very rigid form, with its phosphate anions neutralized by structural components, not by free salt. Ethidium bromide intercalation appears partially to disrupt this structure, perhaps by unwinding, leading to slight changes in its properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 836790     DOI: 10.1021/bi00622a002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  15 in total

1.  The superstructure of chromatin and its condensation mechanism. VI. Electric dichroism and model calculations.

Authors:  M H Koch; Z Sayers; A M Michon; P Sicre; R Marquet; C Houssier
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.733

2.  Study of propidium iodide binding to DNA in intact cells by flow cytometry.

Authors:  A Bertuzzi; I D'Agnano; A Gandolfi; A Graziano; G Starace; P Ubezio
Journal:  Cell Biophys       Date:  1990-12

3.  Change in chromatin organization related to in vivo transcriptional activity and histone synthesis independent of DNA replication during differentiation (germination) of Physarum spherules.

Authors:  Philippe Albert; Barbara Toublan; Isabelle Lacorre-Arescaldino
Journal:  Rouxs Arch Dev Biol       Date:  1992-05

4.  Fluorescent complexes of DNA with DAPI 4',6-diamidine-2-phenyl indole.2HCl or DCI 4',6-dicarboxyamide-2-phenyl indole.

Authors:  J Kapuściński; B Skoczylas
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Molecular flexibility of extended and compacted polynucleosomes. A steady-state fluorescence polarization study.

Authors:  T Härd; P E Nielsen; B Norden
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.733

6.  Twist constraints on linker DNA in the 30-nm chromatin fiber: implications for nucleosome phasing.

Authors:  J Yao; P T Lowary; J Widom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Double-beam autocompensation for fluorescence polarization measurements in flow cytometry.

Authors:  W Beisker; W G Eisert
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Superstructure and CD spectrum as probes of chromatin integrity.

Authors:  G de Murcia; G C Das; M Erard; M Daune
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Ethidium bromide binding to core particle: comparison with native chromatin.

Authors:  M Erard; G C Das; G de Murcia; A Mazen; J Pouyet; M Champagne; M Daune
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1979-07-25       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Increased susceptibility of activated rat liver chromatin to DNAse I.

Authors:  I N Batova; G E Fedoseeva; A V Zelenin
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  1979-12-31       Impact factor: 2.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.