Literature DB >> 8367767

The effects of depth of penetration, screw orientation, and bone density on sacral screw fixation.

S A Smith1, J J Abitbol, G D Carlson, D R Anderson, K W Taggart, S R Garfin.   

Abstract

Obtaining adequate sacral fixation is an important and challenging clinical problem. Bicortical screw fixation has been used to provide improved mechanical strength. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of depth of penetration (unicortical versus bicortical), orientation (medial versus lateral), and bone density on the strength of the bone-screw interface. Seven-millimeter Steffee screws (Acromed, Cleveland, Ohio) were placed in human cadaveric sacra. The screws were placed either medially into the centrum of the S1 body or laterally into the sacral ala. The fixation systems used, either bicortical or unicortical, were tested on a Universal testing machine. The specimens were loaded to failure and biomechanical parameters were measured. Medially oriented screws sustained the highest load to failure. In an older population, unicortical fixation sustained load to failure and initial compliance findings were similar to those for bicortical fixation. The regional bone density in the centrum of the first sacral body was denser than that in the lateral alar region, and also provided more rigid bone screw fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8367767     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199306150-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  15 in total

1.  A study of sacral anthropometry to determine S1 screw placement for spinal lumbosacral fixation in the Korean population.

Authors:  Young-Yul Kim; Kee-Yong Ha; Sang-Il Kim; In-Soo Oh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [Bony sacroiliac corridor. A virtual volume model for the accurate insertion of transarticular screws].

Authors:  T Mendel; K Appelt; P Kuhn; N Suhm
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  Surgical treatment options in patients with impaired bone quality.

Authors:  Norman A Johanson; Jody Litrenta; Jay M Zampini; Frederic Kleinbart; Haviva M Goldman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Can intermuscular cleavage planes provide proper transverse screw angle? Comparison of two paraspinal approaches.

Authors:  Xiaofei Cheng; Bin Ni; Qi Liu; Jinshui Chen; Huapeng Guan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Screw augmentation for spinopelvic fixation in neuromuscular spine deformities: technical note.

Authors:  Arnaud Dubory; Manon Bachy; Houssam Bouloussa; Aurélien Courvoisier; Baptiste Morel; Raphaël Vialle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  L5 spinal nerve injury caused by misplacement of outwardly-inserted S1 pedicle screws.

Authors:  Masahiro Inoue; Gen Inoue; Tomoyuki Ozawa; Masayuki Miyagi; Hiroto Kamoda; Tetsuhiro Ishikawa; Miyako Suzuki; Yoshihiro Sakuma; Yasuhiro Oikawa; Kazuyo Yamauchi; Sumihisa Orita; Masashi Takaso; Tomoaki Toyone; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  [Minimally invasive fixation of a sacral bilateral fracture with lumbopelvic dissociation].

Authors:  T Mendel; P Kuhn; D Wohlrab; K Brehme
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Assessing the effects of lumbar posterior stabilization and fusion to vertebral bone density in stabilized and adjacent segments by using Hounsfield unit.

Authors:  Özgür Demir; Erol Öksüz; Fatih Ersay Deniz; Osman Demir
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12

Review 9.  Fragility fractures of the sacrum: how to identify and when to treat surgically?

Authors:  D Wagner; C Ossendorf; D Gruszka; A Hofmann; P M Rommens
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 10.  Evidence-based support for S1 transpedicular screw entry point modification.

Authors:  Lukasz Kubaszewski; Andrzej Nowakowski; Jacek Kaczmarczyk
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.