Literature DB >> 8367095

Sore throat presentation and management in general practice.

M Kljakovic1.   

Abstract

AIMS: To compare the characteristics of sore throat patients with their having normal throat, to measure the incidence of beta-haemolytic streptococcal growth in both groups, and to determine the clinical outcomes of treating sore throat patients without the aid of a throat swab.
METHOD: Patients were from a suburban general practice. A three phased prospective study of consecutive patients with sore throats as their primary complaint, or with normal throats.
RESULTS: Patients presented with a sore throat at a rate of 45 per 1000 consultations and those with normal throats presented at a rate of 379 per 1000 consultations. 43% of normal throat patients were male compared to 34% with sore throat (chi 2 = 4.62, p < 0.02). The incidence of beta-haemolytic streptococcal growth in sore throat patients was 123 per 1000 consultations per year. 23% of people 14 years and younger had a positive growth compared to 9% of people over 14 years of age. (chi 2 = 5.04, df = 1, p < 0.05). The sore throat presentation peaked over the late autumn to early winter months (June-July) but the beta-haemolytic streptococcal infection rate remained low throughout the year. A history of pain for less than three days and fever, and on examination large neck glands and pus on the tonsils were all positive clinical features for beta-haemolytic streptococcal infection. However use of clinical criteria alone meant 73% of patients with no beta-haemolytic streptococcal infection were falsely treated.
CONCLUSION: Research is needed to develop guidelines for the management of sore throats in general practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8367095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Z Med J        ISSN: 0028-8446


  6 in total

Review 1.  Reconsidering sore throats. Part I: Problems with current clinical practice.

Authors:  W J McIsaac; V Goel; P M Slaughter; G W Parsons; K V Woolnough; P T Weir; J R Ennet
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  A clinical score to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use in patients with sore throat.

Authors:  W J McIsaac; D White; D Tannenbaum; D E Low
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-01-13       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  The validity of a sore throat score in family practice.

Authors:  W J McIsaac; V Goel; T To; D E Low
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-10-03       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Clinical symptoms and signs in sore throat patients with large colony variant beta-haemolytic streptococci groups C or G versus group A.

Authors:  Morten Lindbaek; Ernst Arne Høiby; Gro Lermark; Inger Marie Steinsholt; Per Hjortdahl
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Predicting streptococcal pharyngitis in adults in primary care: a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of symptoms and signs and validation of the Centor score.

Authors:  Jolien Aalbers; Kirsty K O'Brien; Wai-Sun Chan; Gavin A Falk; Conor Teljeur; Borislav D Dimitrov; Tom Fahey
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 8.775

6.  Role of epidemiological risk factors in improving the clinical diagnosis of streptococcal sore throat in pediatric clinical practice.

Authors:  Kapil Bhalla; Parveen Bhardwaj; Ashish Gupta; Shuchi Mehra; Deepak Nehra; Sanjiv Nanda
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2019-10-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.