Literature DB >> 8366685

A patient survey system to measure quality improvement: questionnaire reliability and validity.

R G Carey1, J H Seibert.   

Abstract

This study describes the results of a four-year research effort to develop inpatient and outpatient questionnaires that have sufficient validity and reliability to be used to measure patient perceptions of quality. As part of this effort, over 50,000 inpatients, emergency room patients, and ambulatory surgery patients from over 300 hospitals representing every US census region were surveyed. Separate questionnaires, called Quality of Care Monitors, were developed for inpatients and outpatients. The inpatient questionnaire consisted of 8 scales: Physician Care, Nursing Care, Medical Outcome, Courtesy, Food Service, Comfort and Cleanliness, Admissions/Billing, and Religious Care. The outpatient questionnaire had 7 scales: Physician Care, Nursing Care, Medical Outcome, Facility Characteristics, Waiting Time, Testing Services and Registration Process. The study found strong evidence of construct validity, predictive validity, and internal consistency for both questionnaires. Each questionnaire is capable of measuring separate dimensions of patient experience. A data bank developed from these questionnaires is currently accessed regularly by participating hospitals to assess quality improvement and to make benchmark comparisons with similar hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8366685     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199309000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  57 in total

1.  Psychometric evaluation of an inpatient psychiatric care consumer satisfaction survey.

Authors:  S J Kolb; K E Race; J H Seibert
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  Towards primary care for non-serious 999 callers: results of a controlled study of "Treat and Refer" protocols for ambulance crews.

Authors:  H Snooks; N Kearsley; J Dale; M Halter; J Redhead; W Y Cheung
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-12

3.  Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Hospital-level Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Survey instrument.

Authors:  Onyebuchi A Arah; A H A ten Asbroek; Diana M J Delnoij; Johan S de Koning; Piet J A Stam; Aldien H Poll; Barbara Vriens; Paul F Schmidt; Niek S Klazinga
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Predicting patient satisfaction: a study of two emergency departments.

Authors:  P R Yarnold; E A Michelson; D A Thompson; S L Adams
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1998-12

5.  A French update on the Self-Efficacy Measure for Sleep Apnea (SEMSA) to assess continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) use.

Authors:  Jean-Arthur Micoulaud-Franchi; Olivier Coste; Stéphanie Bioulac; Kelly Guichard; Pierre-Jean Monteyrol; Imad Ghorayeb; Terri E Weaver; Sébastien Weibel; Pierre Philip
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 2.816

6.  Demographic diversity, value congruence, and workplace outcomes in acute care.

Authors:  Michael G Gates; Barbara A Mark
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 2.228

7.  Factors Associated With Family Experience in Pediatric Inpatient Care.

Authors:  Jeremy Y Feng; Sara L Toomey; Marc N Elliott; Alan M Zaslavsky; Sarah E Onorato; Mark A Schuster
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Determining the interviewer effect on CQ Index outcomes: a multilevel approach.

Authors:  Sjenny Winters; Mathilde H Strating; Niek S Klazinga; Rudolf B Kool; Robbert Huijsman
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Results of an evaluation of the effectiveness of triage and direct transportation to minor injuries units by ambulance crews.

Authors:  H Snooks; T Foster; J Nicholl
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Support and Assessment for Fall Emergency Referrals (SAFER 1) trial protocol. Computerised on-scene decision support for emergency ambulance staff to assess and plan care for older people who have fallen: evaluation of costs and benefits using a pragmatic cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Helen Snooks; Wai-Yee Cheung; Jacqueline Close; Jeremy Dale; Sarah Gaze; Ioan Humphreys; Ronan Lyons; Suzanne Mason; Yasmin Merali; Julie Peconi; Ceri Phillips; Judith Phillips; Stephen Roberts; Ian Russell; Antonio Sánchez; Mushtaq Wani; Bridget Wells; Richard Whitfield
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2010-01-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.