| Literature DB >> 836652 |
R B Greenblatt, R H Asch, V B Mahesh, J R Bryner.
Abstract
Estradiol pellet implantation for contraception offers another alternative in conception control. The occurrence of only two pregnancies in 1,668 cycles (Pearl index: 1,42) reflects its efficacy. The advantages over oral contraceptives are: (1) absence of gastrointestinal symptoms, (2) minimal untoward effects, (3) no patient failure, and (4) convenience. Progressive stepdown in dose reduces the total amount of steroid used in long-term contraception. Contraceptive effect may not occur during the first month of implantation; adequate precaution should be taken. Because of the efficacy, minimal untoward side effects, and excellent patient acceptability, this regimen may be considered for contraception in developing countries and when other modalities are contraindicated.Entities:
Keywords: Biology; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Clinical Research; Contraception; Contraceptive Effectiveness; Contraceptive Implants; Contraceptive Methods; Endocrine System; Estradiol--administraction and dosage; Estradiol--side effects; Estrogens; Evaluation; Family Planning; Follicle Stimulating Hormone; Hormones; Luteinizing Hormone; Physiology; Progesterone; Research Methodology; Use-effectiveness
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1977 PMID: 836652 DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(77)90447-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol ISSN: 0002-9378 Impact factor: 8.661