Literature DB >> 8366413

Pain and discomfort levels in patients during root surface debridement with sonic metal or plastic inserts.

D A Grant1, T Lie, S M Clark, D F Adams.   

Abstract

The study was designed to evaluate whether root surface debridement with a sonic scaler plastic insert would cause less pain and discomfort to patients than an ordinary, probe-shaped metal sonic insert. One quadrant in each of 23 patients was debrided with each insert. Blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate were monitored before, during, and immediately after each treatment. Pain was also evaluated on a visual analogue scale (VAS) after each treatment, as well as 2 weeks later following pain-provoking stimuli. Blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate did not reveal any differences between quadrants treated with plastic or metal inserts. Heart rate had a weak, positive association with treatment time. The VAS gave a higher pain score for the plastic (30.8) than for the metal insert (24.4), but this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.055). Following pain-provoking stimuli at the 2-week follow-up visit, quadrants debrided with the metal insert (31.3) scored significantly lower (less pain) (P < 0.01) on the VAS than quadrants treated with the plastic insert (30.7). It is concluded that the sonic metal insert caused less pain and discomfort to the patients due to its superior accessibility and water spray cooling. The significant difference between metal and plastic tip debrided quadrants at the follow-up visit was probably caused by the smearing effect of the metal insert with partial closure of the dentin tubule orifices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8366413     DOI: 10.1902/jop.1993.64.7.645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  6 in total

1.  Hemodynamic changes associated with a novel concentration of lidocaine HCl for impacted lower third molar surgery.

Authors:  Bushara Ping; Sirichai Kiattavorncharoen; Callum Durward; Puthavy Im; Chavengkiat Saengsirinavin; Natthamet Wongsirichat
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-09-30

2.  Pain levels in patients during periodontal probing and mechanical non-surgical therapy.

Authors:  Varol Canakci; Cenk Fatih Canakci
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  The Prevalence of Root Sensitivity following Periodontal Therapy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Y H Lin; D G Gillam
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-10-31

4.  Locoregional anesthesia for dental treatment in cardiac patients: a comparative study of 2% plain lidocaine and 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:100,000).

Authors:  Alessandra Batistela Laragnoit; Ricardo Simões Neves; Itamara Lúcia Itagiba Neves; Joaquim Edson Vieira
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.365

5.  DIAGNOdent Pen versus tactile sense for detection of subgingival calculus: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Fardad Shakibaie; Laurence J Walsh
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2015-10-05

6.  Preprocedural Anxiety and Pain Perception Following Root Surface Debridement in Chronic Periodontitis Patients.

Authors:  Vanaja Krishna Naik; Aruna Balasundaram; Devapriya Appukuttan; Deepavalli Arumuga Nainar; Michael Robert Milward; Dhayanand John Victor; Mohammed Junaid
Journal:  J Nat Sci Biol Med       Date:  2018 Jan-Jun
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.