Literature DB >> 8366397

Heat stress and helicopter pilot errors.

P Froom1, Y Caine, I Shochat, J Ribak.   

Abstract

Helicopter pilots are subjected to degrees of heat stress that under laboratory conditions result in decreased performance. However, the effect of heat stress on the frequency of helicopter pilot errors is uncertain. The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is an association between ambient heat stress and pilot error. The records of 500 helicopter accidents and incidents due to pilot error during the months May through October were selected at random. On the day of the event, ambient dry bulb and wet bulb temperatures were recorded and compared to temperature and humidity readings on 1000 days chosen at random over the same time period, after eliminating days where events occurred. There was a significant difference between the dry temperature distributions of the days with pilot error compared with the control group (chi 2 = 47.54, P < .0001). A dose-response relationship was found, with a significantly lower risk when ambient dry bulb temperatures were 25 to 29 degrees C (odds ratio, 0.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.5 to 0.8, P < .0001), an increased risk of 1.6 (1.3 to 2.0, P < .0001) at 30 to 34 degrees C, and the highest risk at 35 degrees C or more (6.2, 95% confidence interval, 2.1 to 21.8, P < .0002). There is a dose-response relationship between ambient heat stress and pilot error in Israel military helicopter pilots. This is the first study outside the laboratory showing a connection between heat stress and accidents due to human error. Further studies are required to substantiate our findings and to determine whether extrapolation to other settings is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8366397     DOI: 10.1097/00043764-199307000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Med        ISSN: 0096-1736


  6 in total

1.  Exertional thermal strain, protective clothing and auxiliary cooling in dry heat: evidence for physiological but not cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Joanne N Caldwell; Mark J Patterson; Nigel A S Taylor
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Exercise in personal protective equipment in a hot, humid environment does not affect risk propensity.

Authors:  Zachary J Schlader; Jennifer L Temple; David Hostler
Journal:  Temperature (Austin)       Date:  2016-02-22

3.  Impact of elevated core temperature on cognition in hot environments within a military context.

Authors:  Edward Tom Ashworth; James David Cotter; Andrew Edward Kilding
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  The maximum evaporative potential of constant wear immersion suits influences the risk of excessive heat strain for helicopter aircrew.

Authors:  Andrew P Hunt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Per-Cooling (Using Cooling Systems during Physical Exercise) Enhances Physical and Cognitive Performances in Hot Environments. A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Wafa Douzi; Olivier Dupuy; Dimitri Theurot; Juhani Smolander; Benoit Dugué
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Methods for improving thermal tolerance in military personnel prior to deployment.

Authors:  Edward Tom Ashworth; James David Cotter; Andrew Edward Kilding
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2020-11-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.